Cited by 983Cryptography and Data SecurityBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin

Open access
Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., Rubin, A. D.·2013·2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy

Abstract

Bitcoin is the first e-cash system to see widespread adoption. While Bitcoin offers the potential for new types of financial interaction, it has significant limitations regarding privacy. Specifically, because the Bitcoin transaction log is completely public, users' privacy is protected only through the use of pseudonyms. In this paper we propose Zerocoin, a cryptographic extension to Bitcoin that augments the protocol to allow for fully anonymous currency transactions. Our system uses standard cryptographic assumptions and does not introduce new trusted parties or otherwise change the security model of Bitcoin. We detail Zerocoin's cryptographic construction, its integration into Bitcoin, and examine its performance both in terms of computation and impact on the Bitcoin protocol.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sp.2013.34

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. sander, 1999, Auditable, anonymous electronic cash (extended abstract), LNCS, 1666, 555
  2. 2012, Virtual Currency Schemes
  3. dai, 0, B-money Proposal [Online]
  4. camenisch, 0, Dynamic accumulators and application to efficient revocation of anonymous credentials, CRYPTO '02 2002 Extended Abstract [Online] Available
  5. 0, The Bitcoin Laundry
  6. 0, Bitcoin Fog Company
  7. lee, 2011, A Risky Currency? Alleged $500 000 Bitcoin Heist Raises Questions
  8. 0, Blind Bitcoin

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 982

Metadata

Authors
Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., & Rubin, A. D.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-05
Pages
397-411
ISSN
1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013686672
Cited by
983
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 17
FWCI
37.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750, FA8750-11-2-0211)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014)
  • Air Force Research Laboratory (FA8750-11-2- 0211.)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
Bitcoin, e-cash, anonymity, privacy, cryptocurrency, cryptographic constructions, pseudonyms, transaction logs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review