Cited by 15Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataData Quality and ManagementPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

KHyperLogLog: Estimating Reidentifiability and Joinability of Large Data at Scale

Open access
Chia, Pern Hui, Desfontaines, Damien, Perera, Irippuge Milinda, Simmons-Marengo, Daniel, Li, Chao, Day, Wei-Yen, Wang, Qiushi, Guevara, Miguel·2019·2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)

Abstract

Understanding the privacy relevant characteristics of data sets, such as reidentifiability and joinability, is crucial for data governance, yet can be difficult for large data sets. While computing the data characteristics by brute force is straightforward, the scale of systems and data collected by large organizations demands an efficient approach. We present KHyperLogLog (KHLL), an algorithm based on approximate counting techniques that can estimate the reidentifiability and joinability risks of very large databases using linear runtime and minimal memory. KHLL enables one to measure reidentifiability of data quantitatively, rather than based on expert judgement or manual reviews. Meanwhile, joinability analysis using KHLL helps ensure the separation of pseudonymous and identified data sets. We describe how organizations can use KHLL to improve protection of user privacy. The efficiency of KHLL allows one to schedule periodic analyses that detect any deviations from the expected risks over time as a regression test for privacy. We validate the performance and accuracy of KHLL through experiments using proprietary and publicly available data sets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sp.2019.00046

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. P. Jaccard, "Lois de distribution florale dans la zone alpine," vol. 38, pp. 69-130, 01 1902.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chia, P. H., Desfontaines, D., Perera, I. M., Simmons-Marengo, D., Li, C., Day, W.-Y., Wang, Q., & Guevara, M.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
350-364
ISSN
1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910285766
Cited by
15
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
joinability, privacy risk assessment, HyperLogLog, approximate counting, large databases, pseudonymized data, data governance, privacy-preserving data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review