A simple method for detection and classification of ECG noises for wearable ECG monitoring devices
Abstract
An assessment of electrocardiogram (ECG) signal quality has become an unavoidable first step in most holter and ambulatory ECG signal analysis applications. In this paper, we present a simple method for automatically detection and classification of ECG noises. The proposed method consists of four major steps: moving average filter, blocking, feature extraction, and multistage decision-tree algorithm. In the proposed method, the dynamic amplitude range and autocorrelation maximum peak features are extracted for each block. In the first decision stage, a amplitude-dependent decision rule is used for detecting the presence of low-frequency (LF) noise (including, baseline wander (BW) and abrupt change (ABC) artifacts) and the high-frequency (HF) noise (including, power line interference (PLI) and muscle artifacts). In the second decision stage, the proposed method further classifies the LF noise into a BW noise or a ABC noise using the local dynamic amplitude range feature. The HF noise is classified into a PLI noise or a muscle noise using the local autocorrelation maximum peak feature. The proposed detection and classification method is tested and validated using a wide variety of clean and noisy ECG signals. Results show that the method can achieve an average sensitivity (Se) of 97.88%, positive productivity (+P) of 91.18% and accuracy of 89.06%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several sources of noise exist in wearable data, arising from factors such as poor electrode contact with the skin, movement and muscle contraction during the ECG, and external electrical interference.
“Indeed, several sources of noise exist in wearable data, arising from factors such as poor electrode contact with the skin, movement and muscle contraction during the ECG, and external electrical interference16–19.”
From Detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from single-lead electrocardiography adapted for portable and wearable devices (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khunte, A., Sangha, V., Oikonomou, E. K., Dhingra, L. S., Aminorroaya, A., Mortazavi, B. J., Coppi, A., Brandt, C. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Khera, R. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00869-w · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Satija, U., Ramkumar, B., & Manikandan, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar (IN)
- Venue
- 2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-02
- Pages
- 164-169
- OpenAlex
- W2032639994
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
- Keywords
- wearable ECG monitoring, baseline wander, power line interference, muscle artifacts, decision tree classification, moving average filter, ECG signal quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review