Cited by 344Information and Cyber SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bridging the Gap: A Pragmatic Approach to Generating Insider Threat Data

Open access
Glasser, Joshua, Lindauer, Brian·2013·2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops

Abstract

The threat of malicious insider activity continues to be of paramount concern in both the public and private sectors. Though there is great interest in advancing the state of the art in predicting and stopping these threats, the difficulty of obtaining suitable data for research, development, and testing remains a significant hinderance. We outline the use of synthetic data to enable progress in one research program, while discussing the benefits and limitations of synthetic insider threat data, the meaning of realism in this context, as well as future research directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/spw.2013.37

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 17 references

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. stribling, 2013, SCIgen-an Automatic CS Paper Generator
  2. paxton, 0, Use of synthetic data in testing administrative records systems, Proceedings Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) Washington DC 2012
  3. schonlau, 2013, "Masquerading User Data" [Online]
  4. cullen, 0, Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Chicago IL 2011
  5. 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 344

Metadata

Authors
Glasser, J., & Lindauer, B.
Affiliations
Software Engineering Institute (US)
Venue
2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-05
Pages
98-104
OpenAlex
W1991210879
Cited by
344
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (FA8721-05-C-0003, Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003)
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
insider threats, synthetic data, insider threat detection, data scarcity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review