The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contention avoidance and resolution schemes in bufferless all-optical packet-switched networks: a survey
Abstract
Optical Packet Switching (OPS) is the promising switching technique to utilize the huge bandwidth offered by all-optical networks using the DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) technology. However, optical packet contention is the major problem in an OPS network. Resolution and avoidance are two schemes to deal with the contention problem. A resolution scheme resolves collisions, while an avoidance scheme tries to reduce the number of potential collision events. Many OPS architectures rely on optical buffers to resolve contention. Unfortunately, optical buffering technology is still immature as it relies on bulky optical fiber delay lines. Furthermore, it requires a complex control. Therefore, a bufferless OPS network could still be the most straightforward implementation in the near future. In this article, we survey the contention resolution and avoidance schemes proposed for bufferless OPS networks. We also review the resolution and avoidance schemes that can handle the Quality of Service (QoS) issue in a QoS-capable bufferless OPS network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The application of optical packet switching in future communication networks
O'Mahony, M. J., Simeonidou, D., Hunter, D. K., & Tzanakaki, A. (2001) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/35.910600 · Cited by 386
Time sliced optical burst switching
Ramamirtham, J., & Turner, J. (2004) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2003.1209224 · Cited by 139
Wydrowski, B. P., & Zukerman, M. (2002) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2002.1106158 · Cited by 65
A QoS architecture for quantitative service differentiation
Christin, N., & Liebeherr, J. (2003) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2003.1204746 · Cited by 40
Cited by
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
Issues and future directions in traffic classification
Dainotti, A., Pescape, A., & Claffy, K. (2012) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2012.6135854 · Cited by 630
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10040122 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahbar, A. G. P., & Yang, O. W. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 94-107
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108756418
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contention avoidance and resolution schemes in bufferless all-optical packet-switched networks: a survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2008.080408
- The paper
- Rahbar, A. G. P., & Yang, O. W. W. (2008). Contention avoidance and resolution schemes in bufferless all-optical packet-switched networks: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2008.080408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
