The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey on Trust Management for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Abstract
Managing trust in a distributed Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is challenging when collaboration or cooperation is critical to achieving mission and system goals such as reliability, availability, scalability, and reconfigurability. In defining and managing trust in a military MANET, we must consider the interactions between the composite cognitive, social, information and communication networks, and take into account the severe resource constraints (e.g., computing power, energy, bandwidth, time), and dynamics (e.g., topology changes, node mobility, node failure, propagation channel conditions). We seek to combine the notions of "social trust" derived from social networks with "quality-of-service (QoS) trust" derived from information and communication networks to obtain a composite trust metric. We discuss the concepts and properties of trust and derive some unique characteristics of trust in MANETs, drawing upon social notions of trust. We provide a survey of trust management schemes developed for MANETs and discuss generally accepted classifications, potential attacks, performance metrics, and trust metrics in MANETs. Finally, we discuss future research areas on trust management in MANETs based on the concept of social and cognitive networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605 · cited 1×
“Liu et al. [49] describe the characteristics of attacks in MANETs by both the nature of attacks and the type of attackers.”
BackgroundHumans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190 · cited 1×
“…making is in our everyday life, trust establishment and management in MANETs face challenges due to the severe resource constraints, the open nature of the wireless medium, the complex dependence between the communications, social and application networks, and, hence, the complex dependency of any…”
BackgroundDefining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support
Walker, W. E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J. P., van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., & Krayer von Krauss, M. P. (2003) · Integrated Assessment · doi:10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466 · Cited by 2,067
A survey of trust in internet applications
Grandison, T., & Sloman, M. (2000) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2000.5340804 · Cited by 1,157
Cognitive Networks: Towards Self‐Aware Networks
(2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470515143 · Cited by 132
Cited by
A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems
Mitchell, R., & Chen, I.-R. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2542049 · Cited by 768
Self-citationSecuring Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659
Decentralized Trust Evaluation in Vehicular Internet of Things
Guleng, S., Wu, C., Chen, X., Wang, X., Yoshinaga, T., & Ji, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2893262 · Cited by 110
A Review on Human–Machine Trust Evaluation: Human-Centric and Machine-Centric Perspectives
Gebru, B., Zeleke, L., Blankson, D., Nabil, M., Nateghi, S., Homaifar, A., & Tunstel, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3144956 · Cited by 101
Malicious Node Detection in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning
Eziama, E., Tepe, K., Balador, A., Nwizege, K. S., & Jaimes, L. M. S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2018.8644127 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, J.-H., Swami, A., & Chen, I.-R.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-583
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122516858
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 43.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Trust Management for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2011.092110.00088
- The paper
- Cho, J.-H., Swami, A., & Chen, I.-R. (2011). A Survey on Trust Management for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2011.092110.00088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.