The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies
Abstract
Machine-to-Machine (M2M) refers to technologies with various applications. In order to provide the vision and goals of M2M, an M2M ecosystem with a service platform must be established by the key players in industrial domains so as to substantially reduce development costs and improve time to market of M2M devices and services. The service platform must be supported by M2M enabling technologies and standardization. In this paper, we present a survey of existing M2M service platforms and explore the various research issues and challenges involved in enabling an M2M service platform. We first classify M2M nodes according to their characteristics and required functions, and we then highlight the features of M2M traffic. With these in mind, we discuss the necessity of M2M platforms. By comparing and analyzing the existing approaches and solutions of M2M platforms, we identify the requirements and functionalities of the ideal M2M service platform. Based on these, we propose an M2M service platform (M2SP) architecture and its functionalities, and present the M2M ecosystem with this platform. Different application scenarios are given to illustrate the interaction between the components of the proposed platform. In addition, we discuss the issues and challenges of enabling technologies and standardization activities, and outline future research directions for the M2M network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., & Bormann, C. (2014) · doi:10.17487/rfc7252 · Cited by 2,605 · cited 1×
“The IETF Constrained RESTful Environment (CoRE) working group has defined the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) [79], which provides an application protocol to manipulate the resource of the constrained M2M devices networks and offers features for M2M applications, such as very low overheads, multicast support,…”
Method
Cited by
Next generation 5G wireless networks: a comprehensive survey
Agiwal, M., Roy, A., & Saxena, N. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2532458 · Cited by 3,444
A Comprehensive Survey on Internet of Things (IoT) Toward 5G Wireless Systems
Chettri, L., & Bera, R. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2948888 · Cited by 1,737
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, J., & Yun, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-76
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2119137614
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2013.100713.00203
- The paper
- Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, J., & Yun, J. (2014). M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.100713.00203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
