The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is the Random Access Channel of LTE and LTE-A Suitable for M2M Communications? A Survey of Alternatives
Open accessAbstract
The 3GPP has raised the need to revisit the design of next generations of cellular networks in order to make them capable and efficient to provide M2M services. One of the key challenges that has been identified is the need to enhance the operation of the random access channel of LTE and LTE-A. The current mechanism to request access to the system is known to suffer from congestion and overloading in the presence of a huge number of devices. For this reason, different research groups around the globe are working towards the design of more efficient ways of managing the access to these networks in such circumstances. This paper aims to provide a survey of the alternatives that have been proposed over the last years to improve the operation of the random access channel of LTE and LTE-A. A comprehensive discussion of the different alternatives is provided, identifying strengths and weaknesses of each one of them, while drawing future trends to steer the efforts over the same shooting line. In addition, while existing literature has been focused on the performance in terms of delay, the energy efficiency of the access mechanism of LTE will play a key role in the deployment of M2M networks. For this reason, a comprehensive performance evaluation of the energy efficiency of the random access mechanism of LTE is provided in this paper. The aim of this computer-based simulation study is to set a baseline performance upon which new and more energy-efficient mechanisms can be designed in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues
Čolaković, A., & Hadžialić, M. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 · Cited by 825
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
Toward Massive Machine Type Cellular Communications
Dawy, Z., Saad, W., Ghosh, A., Andrews, J. G., & Yaacoub, E. (2017) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2016.1500284wc · Cited by 452
Towards Massive Connectivity Support for Scalable mMTC Communications in 5G Networks
Bockelmann, C., Pratas, N. K., Wunder, G., Saur, S., Navarro, M., Gregoratti, D., Vivier, G., De Carvalho, E., Ji, Y., Stefanovic, C., et al. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2837382 · Cited by 289
“Thus, enhancement of the access reservation procedure for mMTC traffic has been in the focus of both the research community [3] and standardization [4].”
BackgroundSoftwarization and virtualization in 5G mobile networks: benefits, trends and challenges
Condoluci, M., & Mahmoodi, T. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.09.005 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Laya, A., Alonso, L., & Alonso-Zarate, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-16
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2141804605
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is the Random Access Channel of LTE and LTE-A Suitable for M2M Communications? A Survey of Alternatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2013.111313.00244
- The paper
- Laya, A., Alonso, L., & Alonso-Zarate, J. (2014). Is the Random Access Channel of LTE and LTE-A Suitable for M2M Communications? A Survey of Alternatives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.111313.00244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.