The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graph-Theoretical Methods for Detecting and Describing Gestalt Clusters
Open accessAbstract
A family of graph-theoretical algorithms based on the minimal spanning tree are capable of detecting several kinds of cluster structure in arbitrary point sets; description of the detected clusters is possible in some cases by extensions of the method. Development of these clustering algorithms was based on examples from two-dimensional space because we wanted to copy the human perception of gestalts or point groupings. On the other hand, all the methods considered apply to higher dimensional spaces and even to general metric spaces. Advantages of these methods include determinacy, easy interpretation of the resulting clusters, conformity to gestalt principles of perceptual organization, and invariance of results under monotone transformations of interpoint distance. Brief discussion is made of the application of cluster detection to taxonomy and the selection of good feature spaces for pattern recognition. Detailed analyses of several planar cluster detection problems are illustrated by text and figures. The well-known Fisher iris data, in four-dimensional space, have been analyzed by these methods also. PL/1 programs to implement the minimal spanning tree methods have been fully debugged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A source book of Gestalt psychology.
(1938) · doi:10.1037/11496-000 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Random Walks for Image Segmentation
Grady, L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.233 · Cited by 2,624
An introduction to multisensor data fusion
Hall, D. L., & Llinas, J. (1997) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.554205 · Cited by 2,629
Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions
Wu, H. C., Luk, R. W. P., Wong, K. F., & Kwok, K. L. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1361684.1361686 · Cited by 821
Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method
Xu, C., & Su, Z. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv088 · Cited by 559
A survey of Clustering Algorithms
Rokach, L. (2009) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09823-4_14 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Zahn, C. T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computers
- Published
- 1971-01
- Volume
- C-20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-86
- ISSN
- 0018-9340 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9956
- 2326-3814
- OpenAlex
- W1972969203
- Cited by
- 1,759
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.