Cited by 821Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Text Analysis TechniquesAlgorithms and Data Compression

Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions

Wu, Ho Chung, Luk, Robert Wing Pong, Wong, Kam Fai, Kwok, Kui Lam·2008·ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Abstract

A novel probabilistic retrieval model is presented. It forms a basis to interpret the TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions. It simulates the local relevance decision-making for every location of a document, and combines all of these “local” relevance decisions as the “document-wide” relevance decision for the document. The significance of interpreting TF-IDF in this way is the potential to: (1) establish a unifying perspective about information retrieval as relevance decision-making; and (2) develop advanced TF-IDF-related term weights for future elaborate retrieval models. Our novel retrieval model is simplified to a basic ranking formula that directly corresponds to the TF-IDF term weights. In general, we show that the term-frequency factor of the ranking formula can be rendered into different term-frequency factors of existing retrieval systems. In the basic ranking formula, the remaining quantity - log p (r¯| t ∈ d ) is interpreted as the probability of randomly picking a nonrelevant usage (denoted by r¯) of term t . Mathematically, we show that this quantity can be approximated by the inverse document-frequency (IDF). Empirically, we show that this quantity is related to IDF, using four reference TREC ad hoc retrieval data collections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1361684.1361686

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TF-IDF language model is an information retrieval theory that dates back to the mid 1970s.

    “The TF-IDF language model, which is used by many AI/ML-based text predicting systems, is actually an information retrieval theory that dates back to the mid 1970s 1,2,3 .”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, H. C., Luk, R. W. P., Wong, K. F., & Kwok, K. L.
Affiliations
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Published
2008-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
1-37
ISSN
  • 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2868
OpenAlex
W1965667542
Cited by
821
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 41
FWCI
27.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong (PolyU 5226/05E)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
TF-IDF, probabilistic retrieval models, document ranking, inverse document frequency, ad hoc retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review