The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Robust identification of a nonminimum phase system: Blind adjustment of a linear equalizer in data communications
Abstract
Consider an unknown linear time-invariant system without control, driven by a white noise with known distribution. We are interested in the identification of this system, observing only the output. This problem is well known under the major assumption: the system is minimum (or maximum!) phase, in which the very popular least squares method gives an identification of the system in an autoregressive form. However, we are Interested in the case where the system is nonminimum (nor maximum!) phase, i.e., we want identification of both gain and phase of the system. The literature gives only a negative result: the idenfication of the phase of the system is impossible in the case of a Gaussian driving noise (hence, second-order statistics are irrelevant to our problem). For a large class of other input distributions, we present an identification procedure, and give some numerical results for a concrete case origin of our study: the blind adjustment of a transversal equalizer without any startup period prior to data transmission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A least-squares approach to blind channel identification
Xu, G., Liu, H., Tong, L., & Kailath, T. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.476442 · Cited by 777
Metadata
- Authors
- Benveniste, A., Goursat, M., & Ruget, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 1980-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-399
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096727359
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.