The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cooperative Control of Dynamical Systems With Application to Autonomous Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, a new framework based on matrix theory is proposed to analyze and design cooperative controls for a group of individual dynamical systems whose outputs are sensed by or communicated to others in an intermittent, dynamically changing, and local manner. In the framework, sensing/communication is described mathematically by a time-varying matrix whose dimension is equal to the number of dynamical systems in the group and whose elements assume piecewise-constant and binary values. Dynamical systems are generally heterogeneous and can be transformed into a canonical form of different, arbitrary, but finite relative degrees. Utilizing a set of new results on augmentation of irreducible matrices and on lower triangulation of reducible matrices, the framework allows a designer to study how a general local-and-output-feedback cooperative control can determine group behaviors of the dynamical systems and to see how changes of sensing/communication would impact the group behaviors over time. A necessary and sufficient condition on convergence of a multiplicative sequence of reducible row-stochastic (diagonally positive) matrices is explicitly derived, and through simple choices of a gain matrix in the cooperative control law, the overall closed-loop system is shown to exhibit cooperative behaviors (such as single group behavior, multiple group behaviors, adaptive cooperative behavior for the group, and cooperative formation including individual behaviors). Examples, including formation control of nonholonomic systems in the chained form, are used to illustrate the proposed framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots
Krieger, M. J. B., Billeter, J.-B., & Keller, L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023164 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Cao, Y., Ren, W., & Meng, Z. (2010) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.06.002 · Cited by 405
Distributed formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots without global position measurements
Liu, T., & Jiang, Z.-P. (2013) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.031 · Cited by 347
Distributed Adaptive Tracking Control for Synchronization of Unknown Networked Lagrangian Systems
Chen, G., & Lewis, F. L. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2010.2095497 · Cited by 275
Mapping Two Decades of Autonomous Vehicle Research: A Systematic Scientometric Analysis
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Paz, A. (2021) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2020.1780868 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Qu, Z., Wang, J., & Hull, R. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 894-911
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249525427
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 30.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperative Control of Dynamical Systems With Application to Autonomous Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2008.920232
- The paper
- Qu, Z., Wang, J., & Hull, R. A. (2008). Cooperative Control of Dynamical Systems With Application to Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2008.920232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.