The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agreeing Asynchronously
Open accessAbstract
This paper formulates and solves a version of the widely studied Vicsek consensus problem in which each member of a group ofn> 1 agents independently updates its heading at times determined by its own clock. It is not assumed that the agents' clocks are synchronized or that the ldquoeventrdquo times between which any one agent updates its heading are evenly spaced. Nor is it assumed that heading updates must occur instantaneously. Using the concept of ldquoanalytic synchronizationrdquo together with several key results concerned with properties of ldquocompositionsrdquo of directed graphs, it is shown that the conditions under which a consensus is achieved are essentially the same as those applicable in the synchronous case provided the notion of an agent's neighbor between its event times is appropriately defined. However, in sharp contrast with the synchronous case where for analysis anndimensional state space model is adequate, for the asynchronous version of the problem a 2n-dimensional state space model is required. It is explained how to analyze this model despite the fact that, unlike the synchronous case, the stochastic matrices involved do not have all positive diagonal entries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Self-citationDistributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms
Tsitsiklis, J., Bertsekas, D., & Athans, M. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1986.1104412 · Cited by 1,967
Cited by
Cao, Y., Stuart, D., Ren, W., & Meng, Z. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2010.2053542 · Cited by 567
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Group consensus in multi-agent systems with switching topologies and communication delays
Yu, J., & Wang, L. (2010) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.03.009 · Cited by 485
Cao, Y., Ren, W., & Meng, Z. (2010) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.06.002 · Cited by 405
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part II
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.03.005 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, M., Morse, A. S., & Anderson, B. D. O.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1826-1838
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2295171903
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agreeing Asynchronously. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2008.929387
- The paper
- Cao, M., Morse, A. S., & Anderson, B. D. O. (2008). Agreeing Asynchronously. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2008.929387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.