Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 904

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Networked Control Systems With Communication Constraints: Tradeoffs Between Transmission Intervals, Delays and Performance

Heemels, W P Maurice H, Teel, Andrew R, van de Wouw, Nathan, Nešić, Dragan·2010·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

There are many communication imperfections in networked control systems (NCS) such as varying transmission delays, varying sampling/transmission intervals, packet loss, communication constraints and quantization effects. Most of the available literature on NCS focuses on only some of these aspects, while ignoring the others. In this paper we present a general framework that incorporates communication constraints, varying transmission intervals and varying delays. Based on a newly developed NCS model including all these network phenomena, we will provide an explicit construction of a continuum of Lyapunov functions. Based on this continuum of Lyapunov functions we will derive bounds on the maximally allowable transmission interval (MATI) and the maximally allowable delay (MAD) that guarantee stability of the NCS in the presence of communication constraints. The developed theory includes recently improved results for delay-free NCS as a special case. After considering stability, we also study semi-global practical stability (under weaker conditions) and performance of the NCS in terms ofLpgains from disturbance inputs to controlled outputs. The developed results lead to tradeoff curves between MATI, MAD and performance gains that depend on the used protocol. These tradeoff curves provide quantitative information that supports the network designer when selecting appropriate networks and protocols guaranteeing stability and a desirable level of performance, while being robust to specified variations in delays and transmission intervals. The complete design procedure will be illustrated using a benchmark example.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tac.2010.2042352

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 904

Metadata

Authors
Heemels, W. P. M. H., Teel, A. R., van de Wouw, N., & Nešić, D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2010-08
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
1781-1796
ISSN
  • 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2523
OpenAlex
W2141333364
Cited by
904
References
1
FWCI
87.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Networked Control Systems With Communication Constraints: Tradeoffs Between Transmission Intervals, Delays and Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2010.2042352
The paper
Heemels, W. P. M. H., Teel, A. R., van de Wouw, N., & Nešić, D. (2010). Networked Control Systems With Communication Constraints: Tradeoffs Between Transmission Intervals, Delays and Performance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2010.2042352

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.