Cited by 1,407Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems DesignAge of Information Optimization

Periodic Event-Triggered Control for Linear Systems

Heemels, W. P. M. H., Donkers, M. C. F., Teel, Andrew R.·2013·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

Event-triggered control (ETC) is a control strategy that is especially suited for applications where communication resources are scarce. By updating and communicating sensor and actuator data only when needed for stability or performance purposes, ETC is capable of reducing the amount of communications, while still retaining a satisfactory closed-loop performance. In this paper, an ETC strategy is proposed by striking a balance between conventional periodic sampled-data control and ETC, leading to so-called periodic event-triggered control (PETC). In PETC, the event-triggering condition is verified periodically and at every sampling time it is decided whether or not to compute and to transmit new measurements and new control signals. The periodic character of the triggering conditions leads to various implementation benefits, including a minimum inter-event time of (at least) the sampling interval of the event-triggering condition. The PETC strategies developed in this paper apply to both static state-feedback and dynamical output-based controllers, as well as to both centralized and decentralized (periodic) event-triggering conditions. To analyze the stability and theL2-gain properties of the resulting PETC systems, three different approaches will be presented based on 1) impulsive systems, 2) piecewise linear systems, and 3) perturbed linear systems. Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three approaches will be discussed and the developed theory will be illustrated using a numerical example.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tac.2012.2220443

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heemels, W. P. M. H., Donkers, M. C. F., & Teel, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2013-04
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
847-861
ISSN
  • 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2523
OpenAlex
W2100409338
Cited by
1,407
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
68.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
Keywords
periodic event-triggered control, event-triggered control, linear systems, sampled-data control, communication resource reduction, stability analysis, L2-gain, impulsive systems, piecewise linear systems, perturbed linear systems, output-based control, state feedback control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review