The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Delay in Multi-Agent Consensus and Oscillator Synchronization
Abstract
The coordinated motion of multi-agent systems and oscillator synchronization are two important examples of networked control systems. In this technical note, we consider what effect multiple, non-commensurate (heterogeneous) communication delays can have on the consensus properties of large-scale multi-agent systems endowed with nonlinear dynamics. We show that the structure of the delayed dynamics allows functionality to be retained for arbitrary communication delays, even for switching topologies under certain connectivity conditions. The results are extended to the related problem of oscillator synchronization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 2×
“It has been investigated in [3], [5], [15], [16], [22], for the case in which the system does not have any delays that make the state-space infinite-dimensional.”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Self-citation
Cited by
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Distributed Adaptive Control of Synchronization in Complex Networks
Yu, W., DeLellis, P., Chen, G., di Bernardo, M., & Kurths, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2012.2183190 · Cited by 403
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part II
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.03.005 · Cited by 294
Delay robustness in consensus problems
Münz, U., Papachristodoulou, A., & Allgöwer, F. (2010) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.04.008 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Papachristodoulou, A., Jadbabaie, A., & Münz, U.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1471-1477
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2170774893
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Delay in Multi-Agent Consensus and Oscillator Synchronization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2010.2044274
- The paper
- Papachristodoulou, A., Jadbabaie, A., & Münz, U. (2010). Effects of Delay in Multi-Agent Consensus and Oscillator Synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2010.2044274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
