The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability Analysis of Networked Control Systems Using a Switched Linear Systems Approach
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we study the stability of networked control systems (NCSs) that are subject to time-varying transmission intervals, time-varying transmission delays, and communication constraints. Communication constraints impose that, per transmission, only one node can access the network and send its information. The order in which nodes send their information is orchestrated by a network protocol, such as, the Round-Robin (RR) and the Try-Once-Discard (TOD) protocol. In this paper, we generalize the mentioned protocols to novel classes of so-called “periodic” and “quadratic” protocols. By focusing on linear plants and controllers, we present a modeling framework for NCSs based on discrete-time switched linear uncertain systems. This framework allows the controller to be given in discrete time as well as in continuous time. To analyze stability of such systems for a range of possible transmission intervals and delays, with a possible nonzero lower bound, we propose a new procedure to obtain a convex overapproximation in the form of a polytopic system with norm-bounded additive uncertainty. We show that this approximation can be made arbitrarily tight in an appropriate sense. Based on this overapproximation, we derive stability results in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). We illustrate our stability analysis on the benchmark example of a batch reactor and show how this leads to tradeoffs between different protocols, allowable ranges of transmission intervals and delays. In addition, we show that the exploitation of the linearity of the system and controller leads to a significant reduction in conservatism with respect to existing approaches in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantization, Time Delays, and Nonlinear Stabilization
Liberzon, D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2006.878780 · Cited by 196
Cited by
Periodic Event-Triggered Control for Linear Systems
Heemels, W. P. M. H., Donkers, M. C. F., & Teel, A. R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2012.2220443 · Cited by 1,407
Self-citationA novel semantic-based multi-packet parallel transmission scheme for networked control systems
Yang, H., Peng, C., Cao, Z., & Zhang, X.-M. (2025) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112120 · Cited by 44
Chen, Q., & Ma, R. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2023.3332785 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Donkers, M. C. F., Heemels, W. P. M. H., van de Wouw, N., & Hetel, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2101-2115
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095620344
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 68.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.