The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Noncooperative Games
Abstract
We introduce a non-model based approach for locally stable convergence to Nash equilibria in static, noncooperative games with$N$players. In classical game theory algorithms, each player employs the knowledge of the functional form of his payoff and the knowledge of the other players' actions, whereas in the proposed algorithm, the players need to measure only their own payoff values. This strategy is based on the extremum seeking approach, which has previously been developed for standard optimization problems and employs sinusoidal perturbations to estimate the gradient. We consider static games with quadratic payoff functions before generalizing our results to games with non-quadratic payoff functions that are the output of a dynamic system. Specifically, we consider general nonlinear differential equations with$N$inputs and$N$outputs, where in the steady state, the output signals represent the payoff functions of a noncooperative game played by the steady-state values of the input signals. We employ the standard local averaging theory and obtain local convergence results for both quadratic payoffs, where the actual convergence is semi-global, and non-quadratic payoffs, where the potential existence of multiple Nash equilibria precludes semi-global convergence. Our convergence conditions coincide with conditions that arise in model-based Nash equilibrium seeking. However, in our framework the user is not meant to check these conditions because the payoff functions are presumed to be unknown. For non-quadratic payoffs, convergence to a Nash equilibrium is not perfect, but is biased in proportion to the perturbation amplitudes and the higher derivatives of the payoff functions. We quantify the size of these residual biases and confirm their existence numerically in an example noncooperative game. In this example, we present the first application of extremum seeking with projection to ensure that the players' actions remain in a given closed and bounded action set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Passivity-Based Approach to Nash Equilibrium Seeking Over Networks
Gadjov, D., & Pavel, L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2018.2833140 · Cited by 339
Distributed Nash equilibrium seeking: A gossip-based algorithm
Salehisadaghiani, F., & Pavel, L. (2016) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.06.004 · Cited by 309
Augmented distributed optimization for networked systems
Xu, J. (2019) · doi:10.32657/10356/68805 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Frihauf, P., Krstic, M., & Basar, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1192-1207
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2026018281
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Noncooperative Games. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2011.2173412
- The paper
- Frihauf, P., Krstic, M., & Basar, T. (2012). Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Noncooperative Games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2011.2173412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.