The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Passivity-Based Approach to Nash Equilibrium Seeking Over Networks
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of distributed Nash equilibrium (NE) seeking over networks, a setting in which players have limited local information on the others' decisions. We start from a continuous-time gradient-play dynamics that converges to an NE under strict monotonicity of the pseudogradient and assumes perfect information. We consider how to modify it in the case of partial, or networked information between players. We propose an augmented gradient-play dynamics with correction, in which players communicate locally only with their neighbors to compute an estimate of the other players' actions. We derive the new dynamics based on the reformulation as a multiagent coordination problem over an undirected graph. We exploit incremental passivity properties and show that a synchronizing, distributed Laplacian feedback can be designed using relative estimates of the neighbors. Under a strict monotonicity property of the pseudogradient, we show that the augmented gradient-play dynamics converges to consensus on the NE of the game. We further discuss two cases that highlight the tradeoff between properties of the game and the communication graph.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 2×
“, [41], we note that the agents dynamics are not integrators or decoupled identical LTI MIMO systems as in typical consensus literature.”
BackgroundResultGodsil, C., & Royle, G. (2001) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9 · Cited by 8,154
Differential Inclusions: Set-Valued Maps and Viability Theory
Aubin, J.-P., & Cellina, A. (1984) · Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69512-4 · Cited by 3,393
Fundamentals of Convex Analysis
Hiriart-Urruty, J.-B., & Lemaréchal, C. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56468-0 · Cited by 1,402
Passivity as a Design Tool for Group Coordination
Arcak, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.902733 · Cited by 781
Projected Dynamical Systems and Variational Inequalities with Applications
Nagurney, A., & Zhang, D. (1996) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2301-7 · Cited by 609
Game theory for cognitive radio networks: An overview
Wang, B., Wu, Y., & Liu, K. J. R. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.04.004 · Cited by 497
ART: An Attack-Resistant Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
Li, W., & Song, H. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2494017 · Cited by 487
Strategic Interaction and Networks
Bramoullé, Y., Kranton, R., & D'Amours, M. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.3.898 · Cited by 467
Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Noncooperative Games
Frihauf, P., Krstic, M., & Basar, T. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2173412 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Gadjov, D., & Pavel, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1077-1092
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- 2334-3303
- OpenAlex
- W2611964096
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Passivity-Based Approach to Nash Equilibrium Seeking Over Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2018.2833140
- The paper
- Gadjov, D., & Pavel, L. (2019). A Passivity-Based Approach to Nash Equilibrium Seeking Over Networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2018.2833140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.