The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Secure Estimation and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Under Adversarial Attacks
Open accessAbstract
The vast majority of today's critical infrastructure is supported by numerous feedback control loops and an attack on these control loops can have disastrous consequences. This is a major concern since modern control systems are becoming large and decentralized and thus more vulnerable to attacks. This paper is concerned with the estimation and control of linear systems when some of the sensors or actuators are corrupted by an attacker. We give a new simple characterization of the maximum number of attacks that can be detected and corrected as a function of the pair (A,C) of the system and we show in particular that it is impossible to accurately reconstruct the state of a system if more than half the sensors are attacked. In addition, we show how the design of a secure local control loop can improve the resilience of the system. When the number of attacks is smaller than a threshold, we propose an efficient algorithm inspired from techniques in compressed sensing to estimate the state of the plant despite attacks. We give a theoretical characterization of the performance of this algorithm and we show on numerical simulations that the method is promising and allows to reconstruct the state accurately despite attacks. Finally, we consider the problem of designing output-feedback controllers that stabilize the system despite sensor attacks. We show that a principle of separation between estimation and control holds and that the design of resilient output feedback controllers can be reduced to the design of resilient state estimators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Distributed Krein space-based attack detection over sensor networks under deception attacks
Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Zhong, M., & Zhang, X.-M. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108557 · Cited by 341
Secure Control Systems: A Quantitative Risk Management Approach
(2015) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2014.2364709 · Cited by 316
Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review
Yadav, G., & Paul, K. (2021) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100433 · Cited by 261
State of the art of cyber-physical systems security: An automatic control perspective
Zacchia Lun, Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Smarra, F., Malavolta, I., & Di Benedetto, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.006 · Cited by 211
Joint attack detection and secure state estimation of cyber‐physical systems
Forti, N., Battistelli, G., Chisci, L., & Sinopoli, B. (2020) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.4724 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Fawzi, H., Tabuada, P., & Diggavi, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1454-1467
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2062132646
- Cited by
- 1,278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 91.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secure Estimation and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Under Adversarial Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2014.2303233
- The paper
- Fawzi, H., Tabuada, P., & Diggavi, S. (2014). Secure Estimation and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Under Adversarial Attacks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2014.2303233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.