The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Constrained Optimization by Consensus-Based Primal-Dual Perturbation Method
Open accessAbstract
Various distributed optimization methods have been developed for solving problems which have simple local constraint sets and whose objective function is the sum of local cost functions of distributed agents in a network. Motivated by emerging applications in smart grid and distributed sparse regression, this paper studies distributed optimization methods for solving general problems which have a coupled global cost function and have inequality constraints. We consider a network scenario where each agent has no global knowledge and can access only its local mapping and constraint functions. To solve this problem in a distributed manner, we propose a consensus-based distributed primal-dual perturbation (PDP) algorithm. In the algorithm, agents employ the average consensus technique to estimate the global cost and constraint functions via exchanging messages with neighbors, and meanwhile use a local primal-dual perturbed subgradient method to approach a global optimum. The proposed PDP method not only can handle smooth inequality constraints but also non-smooth constraints such as some sparsity promoting constraints arising in sparse optimization. We prove that the proposed PDP algorithm converges to an optimal primal-dual solution of the original problem, under standard problem and network assumptions. Numerical results illustrating the performance of the proposed algorithm for a distributed demand response control problem in smart grid are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
John Lu, Z. Q. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00646_6.x · Cited by 12,390
Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods
Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1989) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 5,293
Distributed Subgradient Methods for Multi-Agent Optimization
Nedic, A., & Ozdaglar, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.2009515 · Cited by 3,719
Fast linear iterations for distributed averaging
Xiao, L., & Boyd, S. (2004) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2004.02.022 · Cited by 2,706
Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions
Nesterov, Y. (2005) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0552-5 · Cited by 2,455
Convex Analysis and Optimization
Bertsekas, D. P., Nedić, A., & Ozdaglar, A. (2003) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2,148
Constrained Consensus and Optimization in Multi-Agent Networks
Nedic, A., Ozdaglar, A., & Parrilo, P. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2041686 · Cited by 2,086
Self-citation
Cited by
A survey of distributed optimization
Yang, T., Yi, X., Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Meng, Z., Hong, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Z., & Johansson, K. H. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 913
Multi-Agent Distributed Optimization via Inexact Consensus ADMM
Chang, T.-H., Hong, M., & Wang, X. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2014.2367458 · Cited by 444
Self-citationA Distributed Algorithm for Solving a Linear Algebraic Equation
Mou, S., Liu, J., & Morse, A. S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2015.2414771 · Cited by 284
Multi-Agent Safe Policy Learning for Power Management of Networked Microgrids
Zhang, Q., Dehghanpour, K., Wang, Z., Qiu, F., & Zhao, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2020.3034827 · Cited by 137
Supervised Learning Under Distributed Features
Ying, B., Yuan, K., & Sayed, A. H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2018.2881661 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, T.-H., Nedic, A., & Scaglione, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1524-1538
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- 2334-3303
- OpenAlex
- W2155356457
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 45.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Constrained Optimization by Consensus-Based Primal-Dual Perturbation Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2014.2308612
- The paper
- Chang, T.-H., Nedic, A., & Scaglione, A. (2014). Distributed Constrained Optimization by Consensus-Based Primal-Dual Perturbation Method. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2014.2308612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
