The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Online Optimization in Dynamic Environments Using Mirror Descent
Open accessAbstract
This work addresses decentralized online optimization in nonstationary environments. A network of agents aim to track the minimizer of a global, time-varying, and convex function. The minimizer follows a known linear dynamics corrupted by unknown unstructured noise. At each time, the global function (which could be a tracking error) can be cast as a sum of a finite number of local functions, each of which is assigned to one agent in the network. Moreover, the local functions become available to agents sequentially, and agents do not have prior knowledge of the future cost functions. Therefore, agents must communicate with each other to build an online approximation of the global function. We propose a decentralized variation of the celebrated mirror descent algorithm, according to which agents perform a consensus step to follow the global function and take into account the dynamics of the global minimizer. In order to measure the performance of the proposed online algorithm, we compare it to its offline counterpart, where the global functions are available a priori. The gap between the two losses is defined as dynamic regret. We establish a regret bound that scales inversely in the spectral gap of the network and represents the deviation of minimizer sequence with respect to the given dynamics. We show that our framework subsumes a number of results in distributed optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods
Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1989) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 5,293
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020411 · Cited by 4,642
Distributed Subgradient Methods for Multi-Agent Optimization
Nedic, A., & Ozdaglar, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.2009515 · Cited by 3,719
Bar‐Shalom, Y. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,157
(2003) · Cited by 1,733
Distributed Kalman filtering for sensor networks
Olfati-Saber, R. (2007) · 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control · doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434303 · Cited by 1,586
PROBLEMS IN DECENTRALIZED DECISION MAKING AND COMPUTATION
Τσιτσικλής, Ι. (2014) · doi:10.12681/eadd/3778 · Cited by 1,278
EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimization
Shi, W., Ling, Q., Wu, G., & Yin, W. (2015) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/14096668x · Cited by 1,261
Online Learning and Online Convex Optimization
Shalev-Shwartz, S. (2012) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000018 · Cited by 1,246
Distributed average consensus with least-mean-square deviation
Xiao, L., Boyd, S., & Kim, S.-J. (2007) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2006.08.010 · Cited by 1,107
Cited by
Central Server Free Federated Learning over Single-sided Trust Social Networks
He, C., Tan, C., Tang, H., Qiu, S., & Liu, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.04956 · Cited by 60
Zhao, Y., Yu, C., Zhao, P., Tang, H., Qiu, S., & Liu, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10593 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahrampour, S., & Jadbabaie, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 714-725
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2520863159
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Online Optimization in Dynamic Environments Using Mirror Descent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2017.2743462
- The paper
- Shahrampour, S., & Jadbabaie, A. (2018). Distributed Online Optimization in Dynamic Environments Using Mirror Descent. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2017.2743462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.