Cited by 54Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationStability and Control of Uncertain Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global Distributed Fault-Tolerant Consensus Control of Nonlinear Delayed Multiagent Systems With Hybrid Faults

Li, Kuo, Ding, Steven X., Zheng, Wei Xing, Hua, Chang-Chun·2024·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

This article is concerned with the distributed leader-following fault-tolerant consensus control problem of uncertain nonlinear delayed multiagent systems with hybrid faults including actuator faults and sensor faults. The faults are described as unknown time-varying functions, which can cause uncertain changes in the fault coefficients of sensors and actuators. In this case, we put forward a novel distributed consensus algorithm. First, we transform the consensus problem into the stability one of a single system by utilizing the sensor fault model and directed topology. Then, the dynamic gain is devised to compensate for uncertain parameters. Based on the backstepping control method, a distributed dynamic controller is designed via measurement data of nonideal sensors. By means of a new Lyapunov function, it is strictly proved that the designed controller can render all agents realizing the full-state consensus in the global sense. Moreover, the proposed algorithm allows that nonlinear dynamics include the state delays, and can be expanded to a fully distributed result. Finally, an example of application in chemical reactor systems is presented to confirm the effectiveness of our theoretical results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tac.2023.3303098

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, K., Ding, S. X., Zheng, W. X., & Hua, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2024-03
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
1967-1974
ISSN
  • 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2523
  • 2334-3303
OpenAlex
W4385627512
Cited by
54
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 7
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61825304, U20A20187, U22A2050)
  • Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Hebei Province (F2020203013)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Keywords
leader-following consensus, nonlinear multi-agent systems, time-delay systems, actuator faults, sensor faults, distributed control, backstepping control, directed topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review