Cited by 46Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityRadiation Effects in ElectronicsCoding theory and cryptography

Fault-Tolerant Encryption for Space Applications

Open access
Banu, R., Vladimirova, T.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the use of commercial security algorithms like the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) in Earth observation small satellites. The demand to protect the sensitive and valuable data transmitted from satellites to ground has increased and hence the need to use encryption on board. AES, which is a very popular choice in terrestrial communications, is slowly emerging as the preferred option in the aerospace industry including satellites. This paper first addresses the encryption of satellite imaging data using five AES modes - ECB, CBC, CFB, OFB and CTR. A detailed analysis of the effect of single even upsets (SEUs) on imaging data during on-board encryption using different modes of AES is carried out. The impact of faults in the data occurring during transmission to ground due to noisy channels is also discussed and compared for all the five modes of AES. In order to avoid data corruption due to SEUs, a novel fault-tolerant model of AES is presented, which is based on the Hamming error correction code. A field programmable gate array (FPGA) implementation of the proposed model is carried out and measurements of the power and throughput overhead are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taes.2009.4805278

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 2007, XPower User Guide
  2. 2006, The Application of CCSDS Protocols to Secure Systems
  3. 2007, Vegetation images samples
  4. 2007, The Rijndael Home Page
  5. 2006, Security threats against space missions
  6. 2007, Directory of Earth Observation Resources
  7. 2004, AES validation list
  8. vladimirova, 2005, On-board encryption in satellites, Proceedings of the 8th Military and Aerospace Applications of Programmable Logic Devices and Technologies International Conference (MAPLD'2005), f 184
  9. guttlich, 1999, MeteoSat second generation (MSG) ground segment?LRIT/HRIT mission specific implementation
  10. weiss, 2007, Space mission communications security, 5th Ground System Architecture Workshop (GSAW) 2001
  11. sun, 2001, Micro-minisatellites for affordable EO constellations?RapidEye and DMC, Proc 3rd IAA Symp Small Satellites for Earth Observation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banu, R., & Vladimirova, T.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
Published
2009-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
266-279
ISSN
0018-9251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124687434
Cited by
46
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
Advanced Encryption Standard, single event upset, Earth observation satellites, FPGA implementation, channel noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review