Comparison of boost-based MPPT topologies for space applications
Open accessAbstract
Several boost-derived topologies are analyzed and compared for an aerospace application that uses a 100 V voltage bus. All these topologies have been designed and optimized considering the electrical requirements and the reduced number of space-qualified components. The comparison evaluates the power losses, mass, and dynamic response. Special attention has been paid to those topologies that may cancel the inherent right half plane zero (RHP) zero of the boost topology. Experimental results of the less common topologies are presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The conventional boost topology leads to high power losses due to its reverse recovery diode.
“However, it leads to high power losses due to its reverse recovery diode.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
The switch near-ground converter topology combined with a DET EPS architecture offers good efficiency.
“In addition, this converter topology combined with a DET EPS architecture offers good efficiency [65].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
Garcia et al. have compared and analyzed some boost-based topologies for space applications that use a 100V voltage bus.
“Garcia et al. [65] have compared and analyzed some boostbased topologies for space applications that use a 100V voltage bus, as shown in Fig. 8 (a) to (f).”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
From these topologies, the conventional boost topology requires fewer components and therefore it is characterized by high reliability.
“From these topologies, the conventional boost topology requires fewer components and therefore it is characterized by high reliability.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1109/41.857959 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESC.1987.7077206 · DOI
- 10.1109/APEC.1991.146234 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESC.2004.1355467 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESC.2001.954414 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2011.5937296 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESC.2008.4592551 · DOI
- 10.1007/b100747 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2009.2032187 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2011.5751233 · DOI
- 10.1049/ip-epa:20010656 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2011.5937254 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2011.5705681 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2005.1468760 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2010.5461655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TAES.2011.5937254 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2010.5461645 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/63.774201 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids
Yaqoob, M., Lashab, A., Vasquez, J. C., Guerrero, J. M., Orchard, M. E., & Bintoudi, A. D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2022.3175093 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“DET EPS architecture offers good efficiency [65].”
MethodA Photovoltaic Model Based Method to Monitor Solar Array Degradation On-Board a Microsatellite
Soon, J. J., Chia, J. W., Aung, H., Lew, J. M., Goh, S. T., & Low, K.-S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2018.2822081 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garcia, O., Alou, P., Oliver, J. A., Diaz, D., Meneses, D., Cobos, J. A., Soto, A., Lapena, E., & Rancano, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1091-1107
- ISSN
- 0018-9251 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041698552
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- oa.upm.es
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems (publishedVersion)
- UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Keywords
- maximum power point tracking, boost converter, space power systems, right-half-plane zero, power losses, dynamic response, mass optimization, space-qualified components
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
