The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Data-Driven Health Monitoring Method for Satellite Housekeeping Data Based on Probabilistic Clustering and Dimensionality Reduction
Open accessAbstract
In the operation of artificial satellites, it is very important to monitor the health status of the systems and detect any symptoms of anomalies in the housekeeping data as soon as possible. Recently, the data-driven approach to the system monitoring problem, in which statistical machine learning techniques are applied to the large amount of measurement data collected in the past, has attracted considerable attention. In this paper, we propose a new data-driven health monitoring and anomaly detection method for artificial satellites based on probabilistic dimensionality reduction and clustering, taking into consideration the miscellaneous characteristics of the spacecraft housekeeping data. We applied our method to the telemetry data of the small demonstration satellite 4 (SDS-4) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and evaluated its effectiveness. The results show that the proposed system provides satellite operators with valuable information for understanding the health status of the system and inferring the causes of anomalies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Given the need to overcome the limitations of limit checking techniques some rule-based expert systems and model-based reasoning methods were developed [130].”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [130]
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution
Schölkopf, B., Platt, J. C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A. J., & Williamson, R. C. (2001) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976601750264965 · Cited by 6,168
Support Vector Data Description
Tax, D. M. J., & Duin, R. P. W. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/b:mach.0000008084.60811.49 · Cited by 3,612
Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning
Murphy, K. P., & Russell, S. (2002) · Cited by 2,579
Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component Analyzers
Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. (1999) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976699300016728 · Cited by 1,874
A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data
Zimek, A., Schubert, E., & Kriegel, H. (2012) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11161 · Cited by 864 · cited 1×
“In the context of anomaly detection, it is known that the difference in the distance between anomalous and normal samples and that between normal samples becomes indistinct as the dimensionality becomes higher [21].”
BackgroundA model-based approach to reactive self-configuring systems
Williams, B. C., & Nayak, P. P. (1996) · Cited by 487
An approach to spacecraft anomaly detection problem using kernel feature space
Fujimaki, R., Yairi, T., & Machida, K. (2005) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/1081870.1081917 · Cited by 225
Self-citationUnsupervised Anomaly Detection for Liquid-Fueled Rocket Propulsion Health Monitoring
Schwabacher, M., Oza, N. C., & Matthews, B. L. (2009) · Journal of Aerospace Computing Information and Communication · doi:10.2514/1.42783 · Cited by 68
An Anomaly Detection Method for Spacecraft Using Relevance Vector Learning
Fujimaki, R., Yairi, T., & Machida, K. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11430919_92 · Cited by 51
Self-citationGeneral Purpose Data-Driven Monitoring for Space Operations
Iverson, D. L., Martin, R. A., Schwabacher, M., Spirkovska, L., Taylor, W., Mackey, R., Castle, J. P., & Baskaran, V. (2012) · Journal of Aerospace Computing Information and Communication · doi:10.2514/1.54964 · Cited by 50
Principal Component Analysis and Effective K-means Clustering
Ding, C. H. Q., & He, X. (2004) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972740.54 · Cited by 36
Efficient On-line Fault Diagnosis for Non-Linear Systems
Hutter, F., & Dearden, R. (2003) · Cited by 31
Robinson, P., Shirley, M., Fletcher, D. P., Alena, R., Duncavage, D. P., & Lee, C. (2003) · Cited by 22
Adaptive limit checking for spacecraft telemetry data using regression tree learning
Yairi, T., Nakatsugaawa, M., Ishihama, N., Hori, K., Nakasuka, S., & Machida, K. (2005) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2004.1401008 · Cited by 21
Self-citationIntelligent fault isolation and diagnosis for communication satellite systems
Tallo, D., Durkin, J., & Petrik, E. J. (1992) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/s0736-5853(05)80035-8 · Cited by 16
Nakamura, Y., Nishijo, K., Murakami, N., Kawashima, K., Horikawa, Y., Yamamoto, K., Ohtani, T., Takhashi, Y., & Inoue, K. (2013) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · Cited by 15
Diagnosis Method for Spacecraft Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks
Kawahara, Y., Yairi, T., & Machida, K. (2005) · Cited by 12
Self-citationFULLY AUTOMATIC AND OPERATOR-LESS ANOMALY DETECTING GROUND SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MARS PROBE "NOZOMI"
Nishigori, N., Limited, F., Hashimoto, M., Choki, A., & Mizutani, M. (2001) · Cited by 10
Event diagnosis and recovery in real-time on-board autonomous mission control
Ciceri, F., & Marradi, L. (1994) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-58822-1_107 · Cited by 10
Adaptive Limit Checking for Spacecraft Telemetry Data Using Kernel Principal Component Analysis
Inui, M., Kawahara, Y., Goto, K., Yairi, T., & Machida, K. (2009) · TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES SPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN · doi:10.2322/tstj.7.pf_11 · Cited by 7
Self-citationFinzi, A. E., Lavagna, M. R., & Sangiovanni, G. (2003) · Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · Cited by 7
An Advanced Model-Based Diagnosis Engine
Fijany, A., Vatan, F., Barrett, A., James, M., Mackey, R., Williams, C., & Dvorak, D. L. (2003) · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- decoste, 1997, Automated learning and monitoring of limit functions, Proc Int Symp Artif Intell Robot Autom Space, 287
- decoste and, 0, Automated event detection in space instruments: A case studyusing ipex-2 data and support vector machines, Proc SPIE
- rolincik, 1992, An expert system for diagnosing environmentally induced spacecraft anomalies, Proc 5th Annu Space Oper Appl Res Symp, 36
- chang, 1992, Satellite diagnostic system: An expert system for intelsat satellite operations, Proc 4th Eur Aerosp Conf, 321
- yairi, 2012, Telemetry monitoring by dimensionality reduction and learning hidden Markov model, Proc Int Symp Artif Intell Robot Autom Space
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection
Yang, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Wen, Q., & Sun, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599295 · Cited by 387
Low Earth Orbit Satellite Security and Reliability: Issues, Solutions, and the Road Ahead
Yue, P., An, J., Zhang, J., Ye, J., Pan, G., Wang, S., Xiao, P., & Hanzo, L. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3296160 · Cited by 333
Generalized Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detection
Lesouple, J., Baudoin, C., Spigai, M., & Tourneret, J.-Y. (2021) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2021.05.022 · Cited by 202
Artificial intelligence for satellite communication: A review
Fourati, F., & Alouini, M. (2021) · Intelligent and Converged Networks · doi:10.23919/icn.2021.0015 · Cited by 197
Imputation-based Time-Series Anomaly Detection with Conditional Weight-Incremental Diffusion Models
Xiao, C., Gou, Z., Tai, W., Zhang, K., & Zhou, F. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599391 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Yairi, T., Takeishi, N., Oda, T., Nakajima, Y., Nishimura, N., & Takata, N.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1384-1401
- ISSN
- 0018-9251 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593048559
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems (publishedVersion)
- JAXA Repository (JAXA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- JSPS KAKENHI (JP22560779, JP26289320)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Keywords
- satellite health monitoring, housekeeping data, anomaly detection, probabilistic clustering, spacecraft telemetry, data-driven monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
