The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Reliability Considerations of Spherical Phased Array Antenna for Satellites
Abstract
Reliability is one of the most important aspects for any system onboard a satellite. This paper discusses different failure conditions and a fault-tolerant design of an active spherical phased array antenna (SPAA). This SPAA is having a hemispherical scan coverage for transmission of satellite imagery data at high bit rates to the ground station. Different failure conditions are identified and a criticality rank has been assigned based on their effects on the overall performance of the SPAA. Two entirely different configurations of the array are chosen to select the best one considering the failure effects. Based on these analyses, a rational margin is built such that the array can take care of even the most critical failure condition. This paper provides an insight toward the realization of a reliable phased array and thus useful for a practicing antenna engineer involved in designing antennas for the spacecrafts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1049/el:20000236 · DOI
- muralidharan, 2015, Firefly algorithm for failure correction of linear array of dipole antennas in presence of ground plane with mutual coupling effects, Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J, 30, 1122
- grewal, 2017, A linear antenna array failure correction using improved bat algorithm, Int J RF Microw Comput Aided Eng, 27
- kececioglu, 1991, Reliability Engineering Handbook, 1
- 10.1002/9780470834985 · DOI
- 10.2514/1.42243 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMTT.2003.822017 · DOI
- stamatis, 1995, Failure Modes and Effect Analysis—FMEA Theory to Execution
- 10.1109/TAP.2012.2220328 · DOI
- 1991, MIL-HDBK-217F –Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment
- 10.1109/TANE.1963.4502283 · DOI
- pozar, 2009, Microwave Engineering
- 10.1109/MAES.2007.4376106 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2012.6237576 · DOI
- 10.1109/MAES.2016.150042 · DOI
- 10.1109/7.805438 · DOI
- 10.1109/8.546240 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAP.1965.1138580 · DOI
- 10.1109/8.774136 · DOI
- 10.1002/047178012X · DOI
- 10.1109/TAP.2015.2479678 · DOI
- 10.1109/AEMC.2011.6256904 · DOI
- montgomery, 1994, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers
- 10.1109/TAP.1968.1139103 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Reliability Engineering Approach for Managing Risks in CubeSats
Menchinelli, A., Ingiosi, F., Pamphili, L., Marzioli, P., Patriarca, R., Costantino, F., & Piergentili, F. (2018) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace5040121 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, B. P., Kumar, C., Kumar, V. S., & Srinivasan, V. V.
- Affiliations
- Indian Space Research Organisation (IN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1381-1391
- ISSN
- 0018-9251 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2779783993
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Indian Space Research Organisation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Antenna Design and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Antenna Design and Analysis
- Keywords
- satellite antennas, reliability, failure modes, fault-tolerant design, criticality ranking, design margins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
