Asynchronous and Event-Based Fusion Systems for Affect Recognition on Naturalistic Data in Comparison to Conventional Approaches
Open accessAbstract
Throughout many present studies dealing with multi-modal fusion, decisions are synchronously forced for fixed time segments across all modalities. Varying success is reported, sometimes performance is worse than unimodal classification. Our goal is the synergistic exploitation of multimodality whilst implementing a real-time system for affect recognition in a naturalistic setting. Therefore we present a categorization of possible fusion strategies for affect recognition on continuous time frames of complete recording sessions and we evaluate multiple implementations from resulting categories. These involve conventional fusion strategies as well as novel approaches that incorporate the asynchronous nature of observed modalities. Some of the latter algorithms consider temporal alignments between modalities and observed frames by applying asynchronous neural networks that use memory blocks to model temporal dependencies. Others use an indirect approach that introduces events as an intermediate layer to accumulate evidence for the target class through all modalities. Recognition results gained on a naturalistic conversational corpus show a drop in recognition accuracy when moving from unimodal classification to synchronous multimodal fusion. However, with our proposed asynchronous and event-based fusion techniques we are able to raise the recognition system's accuracy by 7.83 percent compared to video analysis and 13.71 percent in comparison to common fusion strategies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In general, the addition of RNN for temporal modeling is associated with an increase in model accuracy.
“In general, the addition of RNN for temporal modeling is associated with an increase in model accuracy (e.g., [129], [97], [162]).”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [162]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mehrabian, A. (1996) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02686918 · Cited by 1,493 · see citing works
Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame.
Keltner, D. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.441 · Cited by 718 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[17], the display of embarrassment usually starts with a gaze down followed by a sequence of smiles, gaze and head shifts.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Goshvarpour, A., Abbasi, A., & Goshvarpour, A. (2017) · Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-017-0571-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lingenfelser, F., Wagner, J., Deng, J., Brueckner, R., Schuller, B., & Andre, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
- Published
- 2018-10-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 410-423
- ISSN
- 1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
- 2371-9850
- OpenAlex
- W2557887185
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ARIA-VALUSPA (645378)
- KRISTINA (645012)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- affect recognition, multimodal fusion, temporal alignment, asynchronous neural networks, memory blocks, conversational corpus, real-time emotion recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review