Cited by 38Emotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Dynamic alignment and fusion of multimodal physiological patterns for stress recognition

Zhang, Xiaowei, Wei, Xiangyu, Zhou, Zhongyi, Zhao, Qiqi, Zhang, Sipo, Yang, Yikun, Li, Rui, Hu, Bin·2024·IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing

Abstract

Stress has been identified as one of major causes of health issues. To detect the stress levels with higher accuracy, fusion of multimodal physiological signals is a promising technique. However, there is an asynchrony between physiological signals observed from different perspectives. Exploring the temporal alignment relationship between modalities is helpful to improve the quality of multimodal fusion. This paper proposes an end-to-end multimodal stress detection model based on Bidirectional Cross- and Self-modal Attention (BCSA) mechanism. Specifically, we first construct different feature extractors based on the characteristics of Blood Volume Pulse (BVP) and Electrodermal Activity (EDA) to complete automated temporal feature extraction. Secondly, cross-modal attention is used to seek the alignment relationship between the two modalities and fully fuse cross-modal information. The self-modal attention is used to attenuate noise and redundant information, highlight important information and obtain salient stress representations. Finally, the stress representations of the two modalities are processed separately, and the mean square error (MSE) is used to narrow the gap between them. Experimental results on the UBFC-Phys dataset and WESAD dataset show that the proposed model can effectively improve the accuracy of stress recognition, and outperforms several state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taffc.2023.3290177

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-modal alignment maps information from modalities into a shared space to understand relationships.

    “Crossmodal alignment maps information from modalities, such as images and text, into a shared space to understand their relationships [177].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Wei, X., Zhou, Z., Zhao, Q., Zhang, S., Yang, Y., Li, R., & Hu, B.
Affiliations
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2024-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
685-696
ISSN
  • 1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2371-9850
OpenAlex
W4382371644
Cited by
38
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0706200)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62072219, 61632014)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (22JR5RA401)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2022-ey13)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
stress detection, multimodal fusion, physiological signals, temporal alignment, cross-modal attention, blood volume pulse, electrodermal activity, noise attenuation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review