Defect Image Sample Generation With GAN for Improving Defect Recognition
Abstract
This article aims to improve deep-learning-based surface defect recognition. Owing to the insufficiency of the defect images in practical production lines and the high cost of labeling, it is difficult to obtain a sufficient defect data set in terms of diversity and quantity. A new generation method called surface defect-generation adversarial network (SDGAN), which employs generative adversarial networks (GANs), is proposed to generate defect images using a large number of defect-free images from industrial sites. Experiments show that the defect images generated by the SDGAN have better image quality and diversity than those generated by the state-of-the-art methods. The SDGAN is applied to expand the commutator cylinder surface defect image data sets with and without labels (referred to as the CCSD-L and CCSD-NL data sets, respectively). Regarding anomaly recognition, a 1.77% error rate and a 49.43% relative improvement (IMP) for the CCSD-NL defect data set are obtained. Regarding defect classification, a 0.74% error rate and a 57.47% IMP for the CCSD-L defect data set are achieved. Moreover, defect classification trained on the images augmented by the SDGAN is robust to uneven and poor lighting conditions. Note to Practitioners-This article proposes a method of defect image generation to address the lack of industrial defect images. Traditional defect recognition methods have two disadvantages: different types of defects require different algorithms and handcrafted features are deficient. Defect recognition using deep learning can solve the above problems. However, deep learning requires a plethora of images, and the number of industrial defect images cannot meet this requirement. We propose a new defect image-generation method called SDGAN to generate a defect image data set that balances diversity and authenticity. In practice, we employ a large number of defect-free images to generate a large number of defect images using our method to expand the industry defect-free image data set. Then, the augmented defect data set is used to build a deep-learning defect recognition model. Experiments show that the accuracy of defect recognition can be significantly improved by building a deep-learning defect recognition model using the augmented data set. Therefore, deep learning can achieve excellent performance in defect recognition with a limited number of defect images.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GANs are often utilized to generate labelled defective images based on limited labelled samples and sufficient unlabelled samples from industrial sites.
“GANs are often utilized to generate labelled defective images based on the existing limited labelled samples and sufficient unlabelled samples from industrial sites.”
From Automated Visual Defect Classification for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [133]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602 · see citing works
Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.19 · Cited by 12,696 · see citing works
GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium
Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., & Hochreiter, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08500 · Cited by 8,365 · see citing works
Generative Adversarial Networks
Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.2661 · Cited by 4,477 · see citing works
Aircraft Fuselage Defect Detection using Deep Neural Networks
Malekzadeh, T., Abdollahzadeh, M., Nejati, H., & Cheung, N.-M. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09213 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of human-in-the-loop for machine learning
Wu, X., Xiao, L., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Ma, T., & He, L. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.05.014 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Liu, J., Xie, G., Wang, J., Li, S., Wang, C., Zheng, F., & Jin, Y. (2024) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1459-z · Cited by 463 · see citing works
“By improving the style transfer network, SDGAN [156] achieves better results than CycleGAN.”
ResultDefect-GAN: High-Fidelity Defect Synthesis for Automated Defect Inspection
Zhang, G., Cui, K., Hung, T.-Y., & Lu, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00257 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey
Wen, X., Shan, J., He, Y., & Song, K. (2022) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings13010017 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Automated Visual Defect Classification for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey
Luo, Q., Fang, X., Su, J., Zhou, J., Zhou, B., Yang, C., Liu, L., Gui, W., & Tian, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2020.3030167 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Xie, J., Sun, L., & Zhao, Y. F. (2025) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2024.04.024 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Niu, S., Li, B., Wang, X., & Lin, H.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1545-5955 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3783
- OpenAlex
- W3006938707
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- surface defect recognition, generative adversarial networks, data augmentation, anomaly detection, industrial inspection, limited labeled data, illumination robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review