Cited by 251Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Defect Image Sample Generation With GAN for Improving Defect Recognition

Niu, Shuanlong, Li, Bin, Wang, Xinggang, Lin, Hui·2020·IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering

Abstract

This article aims to improve deep-learning-based surface defect recognition. Owing to the insufficiency of the defect images in practical production lines and the high cost of labeling, it is difficult to obtain a sufficient defect data set in terms of diversity and quantity. A new generation method called surface defect-generation adversarial network (SDGAN), which employs generative adversarial networks (GANs), is proposed to generate defect images using a large number of defect-free images from industrial sites. Experiments show that the defect images generated by the SDGAN have better image quality and diversity than those generated by the state-of-the-art methods. The SDGAN is applied to expand the commutator cylinder surface defect image data sets with and without labels (referred to as the CCSD-L and CCSD-NL data sets, respectively). Regarding anomaly recognition, a 1.77% error rate and a 49.43% relative improvement (IMP) for the CCSD-NL defect data set are obtained. Regarding defect classification, a 0.74% error rate and a 57.47% IMP for the CCSD-L defect data set are achieved. Moreover, defect classification trained on the images augmented by the SDGAN is robust to uneven and poor lighting conditions. Note to Practitioners-This article proposes a method of defect image generation to address the lack of industrial defect images. Traditional defect recognition methods have two disadvantages: different types of defects require different algorithms and handcrafted features are deficient. Defect recognition using deep learning can solve the above problems. However, deep learning requires a plethora of images, and the number of industrial defect images cannot meet this requirement. We propose a new defect image-generation method called SDGAN to generate a defect image data set that balances diversity and authenticity. In practice, we employ a large number of defect-free images to generate a large number of defect images using our method to expand the industry defect-free image data set. Then, the augmented defect data set is used to build a deep-learning defect recognition model. Experiments show that the accuracy of defect recognition can be significantly improved by building a deep-learning defect recognition model using the augmented data set. Therefore, deep learning can achieve excellent performance in defect recognition with a limited number of defect images.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tase.2020.2967415

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GANs are often utilized to generate labelled defective images based on limited labelled samples and sufficient unlabelled samples from industrial sites.

    “GANs are often utilized to generate labelled defective images based on the existing limited labelled samples and sufficient unlabelled samples from industrial sites.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niu, S., Li, B., Wang, X., & Lin, H.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
Published
2020
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1545-5955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-3783
OpenAlex
W3006938707
Cited by
251
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 5
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
surface defect recognition, generative adversarial networks, data augmentation, anomaly detection, industrial inspection, limited labeled data, illumination robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review