The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Training Targets for Supervised Speech Separation
Open accessAbstract
Formulation of speech separation as a supervised learning problem has shown considerable promise. In its simplest form, a supervised learning algorithm, typically a deep neural network, is trained to learn a mapping from noisy features to a time-frequency representation of the target of interest. Traditionally, the ideal binary mask (IBM) is used as the target because of its simplicity and large speech intelligibility gains. The supervised learning framework, however, is not restricted to the use of binary targets. In this study, we evaluate and compare separation results by using different training targets, including the IBM, the target binary mask, the ideal ratio mask (IRM), the short-time Fourier transform spectral magnitude and its corresponding mask (FFT-MASK), and the Gammatone frequency power spectrum. Our results in various test conditions reveal that the two ratio mask targets, the IRM and the FFT-MASK, outperform the other targets in terms of objective intelligibility and quality metrics. In addition, we find that masking based targets, in general, are significantly better than spectral envelope based targets. We also present comparisons with recent methods in non-negative matrix factorization and speech enhancement, which show clear performance advantages of supervised speech separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Cited by
Conv-TasNet: Surpassing Ideal Time–Frequency Magnitude Masking for Speech Separation
Luo, Y., & Mesgarani, N. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2019.2915167 · Cited by 2,042
WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processing
Chen, S., Wang, C., Chen, Z., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Li, J., Kanda, N., Yoshioka, T., Xiao, X., et al. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2022.3188113 · Cited by 1,926
Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overview
Wang, D., & Chen, J. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2018.2842159 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationA Regression Approach to Speech Enhancement Based on Deep Neural Networks
Xu, Y., Du, J., Dai, L.-R., & Lee, C.-H. (2015) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2014.2364452 · Cited by 1,366
Deep Learning for Audio Signal Processing
Purwins, H., Li, B., Virtanen, T., Schluter, J., Chang, S.-Y., & Sainath, T. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2019.2908700 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Narayanan, A., & Wang, D.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1849-1858
- ISSN
- 2329-9290 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-9304
- OpenAlex
- W2069681747
- Cited by
- 1,067
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 60.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Training Targets for Supervised Speech Separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/taslp.2014.2352935
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Narayanan, A., & Wang, D. (2014). On Training Targets for Supervised Speech Separation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/taslp.2014.2352935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.