The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speech Intelligibility Potential of General and Specialized Deep Neural Network Based Speech Enhancement Systems
Abstract
In this paper, we study aspects of single microphone speech enhancement (SE) based on deep neural networks (DNNs). Specifically, we explore the generalizability capabilities of state-of-the-art DNN-based SE systems with respect to the background noise type, the gender of the target speaker, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Furthermore, we investigate how specialized DNN-based SE systems, which have been trained to be either noise type specific, speaker specific or SNR specific, perform relative to DNN based SE systems that have been trained to be noise type general, speaker general, and SNR general. Finally, we compare how a DNN-based SE system trained to be noise type general, speaker general, and SNR general performs relative to a state-of-the-art short-time spectral amplitude minimum mean square error (STSA-MMSE) based SE algorithm. We show that DNN-based SE systems, when trained specifically to handle certain speakers, noise types and SNRs, are capable of achieving large improvements in estimated speech quality (SQ) and speech intelligibility (SI), when tested in matched conditions. Furthermore, we show that improvements in estimated SQ and SI can be achieved by a DNN-based SE system when exposed to unseen speakers, genders and noise types, given a large number of speakers and noise types have been used in the training of the system. In addition, we show that a DNN-based SE system that has been trained using a large number of speakers and a wide range of noise types outperforms a state-of-the-art STSA-MMSE based SE method, when tested using a range of unseen speakers and noise types. Finally, a listening test using several DNN-based SE systems tested in unseen speaker conditions show that these systems can improve SI for some SNR and noise type configurations but degrade SI for others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Cited by
Kolbaek, M., Yu, D., Tan, Z.-H., & Jensen, J. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2017.2726762 · Cited by 820
Self-citationWang, N. Y.-H., Wang, H.-L. S., Wang, T.-W., Fu, S.-W., Lu, X., Wang, H.-M., & Tsao, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2020.3042655 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolbæk, M., Tan, Z.-H., & Jensen, J.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-167
- ISSN
- 2329-9290 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-9304
- OpenAlex
- W2550397165
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speech Intelligibility Potential of General and Specialized Deep Neural Network Based Speech Enhancement Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/taslp.2016.2628641
- The paper
- Kolbæk, M., Tan, Z.-H., & Jensen, J. (2017). Speech Intelligibility Potential of General and Specialized Deep Neural Network Based Speech Enhancement Systems. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/taslp.2016.2628641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.