Cited by 3Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood RecognitionTopic Modeling

A Simple and Interactive Transformer for Fine-Grained Emotion Detection

Sui, Dianbo, Li, Bo, Yang, Hang, Chen, Yubo, Liu, Kang, Chu, Dianhui, Zhao, Jun·2025·IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing

Abstract

Fine-grained emotion detection is a long-standing task in sentiment analysis. One of the crucial challenges in this task is to capture emotion correlations. Previous studies either ignore this challenge or resort to a chain-link structure (e.g. seq2seq), both of which encounter some thorny issues in reality. Unlike previous studies, we approach this challenge by proposing a masked language modeling like mechanism, named masked emotion modeling (MEM), which can capture emotion correlations in a simple but effective manner. Specifically, we augment the transformer model with emotion states and require the transformer model to recover masked emotion states. Furthermore, to fully enhance the effect of the proposed MEM, we also introduce a taxonomy-guided sampling strategy at the training phase and an iterative decoding strategy at the test phase. On two widely used datasets, we demonstrate that our method excels at capturing emotion correlations and achieves state-of-the-art results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taslp.2024.3487418

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results on the GoEmotions dataset show improved performance of transformer-based models when integrated with EmoVis_lin.

    “results on the GoEmotions dataset showing improved performance of transformer-based models when integrated with EmoVis lin [30], [49]”

    From Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sui, D., Li, B., Yang, H., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Chu, D., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing
Published
2025
Volume
33
Pages
347-358
ISSN
2998-4173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403863526
Cited by
2
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022ZD0160503)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (6217625, 62306087, 72203005, 72450002)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023QF154)
  • Special Funding Program of Shandong Taishan Scholars Project
  • Open Project of Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Multimodal Cognitive Computation, Anhui University (MMC202420)
  • Beijing Philosophy and Social Science Foundation (24DTR024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
emotional state, masked language modeling, iterative decoding, sentiment analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review