Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview on the time delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization

Open access
Quazi, A.·1981·IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

Abstract

Sonar and radar systems not only detect targets but also localize them. The process of localization involves bearing and range estimation. These objectives of bearing and range estimation can be accomplished actively or passively, depending on the situation. In active sonar or radar systems, a pulsed signal is transmitted to the target and the echo is received at the receiver. The range of the target is determined from the time delay obtained from the echo. In passive sonar systems, the target is detected from acoustic signals emitted by the target, and it is localized using time delays obtained from received signals at spacially separated points. Several authors have calculated the variance of the time delay estimate in the neighborhood of true time delays and have presented their results in terms of coherence function and signal and noise autospectra. Here we analyze these derivations and show that they are the same for the case of low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We also address a practical problem with a target-generated wide-band signal and present the Cramér-Rao lower bound on the variance of the time delay estimate as a function of commonly understood terms such as SNR, bandwidth, observation time, and center frequency of the band. The analysis shows that in the case of low SNR and when signal and noise autospectra are constants over the band or signal and noise autospectra fall off at the same rate, the minimum standard deviation of the time delay estimate varies inversely to the SNR, to the square root of the product of observation time and bandwidth, and to the center frequency (providedW^{2}/12 f\min{0}\max{2} \ll 1, whereW= bandwidth andf_{0}= center frequency of the band). The only difference in the case of a high SNR is that the standard deviation varies inversely to the square root of the SNR, and all other parameter relationships are the same. We also address the effects of different signal and noise autospectral slopes on the variance of the time delay estimate in passive localization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tassp.1981.1163618

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Quazi, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Published
1981-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
527-533
ISSN
0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029521171
Cited by
393
References
6
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview on the time delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tassp.1981.1163618
The paper
Quazi, A. (1981). An overview on the time delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1981.1163618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.