The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations--Part I: Far-field sources
Abstract
This paper deals with source localization using a two-dimensional array of sensors whose locations are not known precisely. If only a single source is observed, uncertainties in sensor location increase errors in source bearing and range by an amount which is independent of signal-to-noise ratio and which can easily dominate over-all localization accuracy. Major performance gains could therefore result from successful calibration of array geometry. The paper derives Cramer-Rao bounds on calibration and source location accuracies achievable with far-field sources whose bearings are not initially known. The sources are assumed to radiate Gaussian noise and to be spectrally disjoint of each other. When the location of one sensor and the direction to a second sensor is known, three noncollinear sources are sufficient to calibrate sensor positions with errors which decrease to zero as calibrating source strength or time-bandwidth products tend to infinity. The sole exception to this statement is a nominally linear array for which such calibration is not possible. When one sensor location is known but no directional reference is available, three noncollinear sources can determine array shape, but there remains a residual error in angular orientation which is irremovable by the calibration procedure. When no sensor locations are known a priori, one adds to the residual error in rotation a translational component. In the far field, the latter should be unimportant. In addition to the asymptotic results, Cramer-Rao bounds are computed for finite signal-to-noise ratios and observation times. One finds that calibration permits significant reductions in localization errors for parameter values well within the practical range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach
Krim, H., & Viberg, M. (1996) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.526899 · Cited by 4,719
A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.850882 · Cited by 2,638
Godara, L. C. (1997) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.622504 · Cited by 2,073
Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations-a maximum likelihood approach
Weiss, A. J., & Friedlander, B. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.45542 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Rockah, Y., & Schultheiss, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 286-299
- ISSN
- 0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111540686
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations--Part I: Far-field sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tassp.1987.1165144
- The paper
- Rockah, Y., & Schultheiss, P. (1987). Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations--Part I: Far-field sources. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1987.1165144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.