A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays
Open accessAbstract
We present a source localization method based on a sparse representation of sensor measurements with an overcomplete basis composed of samples from the array manifold. We enforce sparsity by imposing penalties based on the /spl lscr//sub 1/-norm. A number of recent theoretical results on sparsifying properties of /spl lscr//sub 1/ penalties justify this choice. Explicitly enforcing the sparsity of the representation is motivated by a desire to obtain a sharp estimate of the spatial spectrum that exhibits super-resolution. We propose to use the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the data matrix to summarize multiple time or frequency samples. Our formulation leads to an optimization problem, which we solve efficiently in a second-order cone (SOC) programming framework by an interior point implementation. We propose a grid refinement method to mitigate the effects of limiting estimates to a grid of spatial locations and introduce an automatic selection criterion for the regularization parameter involved in our approach. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method on simulated data by plots of spatial spectra and by comparing the estimator variance to the Crame/spl acute/r-Rao bound (CRB). We observe that our approach has a number of advantages over other source localization techniques, including increased resolution, improved robustness to noise, limitations in data quantity, and correlation of the sources, as well as not requiring an accurate initialization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sparse recovery theory adopts the lp (0 ≤ p ≤ 1) regularisation instead of the l2 regularisation.
“Sparse recovery theory adopts the lp (0 ≤ p ≤ 1) regularisation instead of the l2 regularisation [109], that is, a p-norm item is added to the error function.”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [109]
Numerous methods have been developed to select the regularisation parameter for l2 regularisation, whereas few methods have been devised for lp regularisation (0 ≤ p ≤ 1).
“Numerous methods have been developed to select the regularisation parameter for l2 regularisation, whereas few methods have been devised for lp regularisation (0 ≤ p ≤ 1) [109].”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [109]
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · see citing works
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Ziehe, A., Müller, K.-R., & Nolte, G. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.246 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Zhang, C. D., & Xu, Y. L. (2016) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.1785 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Space–time event sparse penalization for magneto-/electroencephalography
Bolstad, A., Veen, B. V., & Nowak, R. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.056 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Malioutov, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3010-3022
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103519107
- Cited by
- 2,638
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 125 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 185 · 2016: 197 · 2015: 182 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 98
- FWCI
- 39.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- source localization, sparse signal recovery, sensor arrays, array manifold, L1 regularization, super-resolution, spatial spectrum estimation, singular value decomposition, second-order cone programming, mesh refinement, regularization parameter selection, Cramer-Rao lower bound, source correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review