Cited by 2,638Direction-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesSpeech and Audio Processing

A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays

Open access
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., Willsky, A.S.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

We present a source localization method based on a sparse representation of sensor measurements with an overcomplete basis composed of samples from the array manifold. We enforce sparsity by imposing penalties based on the /spl lscr//sub 1/-norm. A number of recent theoretical results on sparsifying properties of /spl lscr//sub 1/ penalties justify this choice. Explicitly enforcing the sparsity of the representation is motivated by a desire to obtain a sharp estimate of the spatial spectrum that exhibits super-resolution. We propose to use the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the data matrix to summarize multiple time or frequency samples. Our formulation leads to an optimization problem, which we solve efficiently in a second-order cone (SOC) programming framework by an interior point implementation. We propose a grid refinement method to mitigate the effects of limiting estimates to a grid of spatial locations and introduce an automatic selection criterion for the regularization parameter involved in our approach. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method on simulated data by plots of spatial spectra and by comparing the estimator variance to the Crame/spl acute/r-Rao bound (CRB). We observe that our approach has a number of advantages over other source localization techniques, including increased resolution, improved robustness to noise, limitations in data quantity, and correlation of the sources, as well as not requiring an accurate initialization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2005.850882

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2005-08
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
3010-3022
ISSN
1053-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103519107
Cited by
2,638
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 125 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 185 · 2016: 197 · 2015: 182 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 98
FWCI
39.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
source localization, sparse signal recovery, sensor arrays, array manifold, L1 regularization, super-resolution, spatial spectrum estimation, singular value decomposition, second-order cone programming, mesh refinement, regularization parameter selection, Cramer-Rao lower bound, source correlation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review