Cited by 15Advanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesDigital Filter Design and ImplementationSpeech and Audio Processing

An efficient technique for high correlation estimation

Jacovitti, G., Cusani, R.·1987·IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

Abstract

Two sum-based estimators are proposed as fast, accurate methods for estimating the normalized acf of stationary processes. For Gaussian processes, their performances are evaluated in terms of bias and covariance, and are compared to the ones of the conventional Direct estimator and of the Hybrid-Sign and the Polarity Coincidence fast methods. For high correlation values, the proposed estimators exhibit the same accuracy as the Direct estimator.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tassp.1987.1165195

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacovitti, G., & Cusani, R.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Published
1987-05
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
654-660
ISSN
0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136972551
Cited by
15
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Digital Filter Design and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
autocorrelation estimation, stationary processes, Gaussian processes, estimation bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review