Cited by 99Software-Defined Networks and 5GImage and Video Quality AssessmentCaching and Content Delivery

Network Resource Allocation System for QoE-Aware Delivery of Media Services in 5G Networks

Martin, Angel, Egana, Jon, Florez, Julian, Montalban, Jon, Olaizola, Igor G., Quartulli, Marco, Viola, Roberto, Zorrilla, Mikel·2018·IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting

Abstract

The explosion in the variety and volume of video services makes bandwidth and latency performance of networks more critical to the user experience. The media industry's response, HTTP-based Adaptive Streaming technology, offers media players the possibility to dynamically select the most appropriate bitrate according to the connectivity performance. Moving forward, the telecom industry's move is 5G. 5G aims efficiency by dynamic network optimization to make maximum use of the resources to get as high capacity and Quality of Service (QoS) as possible. These networks will be based on software defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) techniques, enabling self-management functions. Here, machine learning is a key technology to reach this 5G vision. On top of machine learning, SDN and NFV, this paper provides a network resource allocator system as the main contribution which enables autonomous network management aware of quality of experience (QoE). This system predicts demand to foresee the amount of network resources to be allocated and the topology setup required to cope with the traffic demand. Furthermore, the system dynamically provisions the network topology in a proactive way, while keeping the network operation within QoS ranges. To this end, the system processes signals from multiple network nodes and end-to-end QoS and QoE metrics. This paper evaluates the system for live and on-demand dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP and high efficiency video coding services. From the experiment results, it is concluded that the system is able to scale the network topology and to address the level of resource efficiency, required by media streaming services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbc.2018.2828608

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As the adoption of SDN and NFV matures towards future 5G networks, the software-defined NFV architecture can offer an active traffic steering and joint optimization of network functions that further turns into QoE-management offerings.

    “As the adoption of SDN and NFV matures towards future 5G networks, the software-defined NFV architecture [256] can offer an active traffic steering and joint optimization of network functions that further turns into QoE-management offerings [257].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, A., Egana, J., Florez, J., Montalban, J., Olaizola, I. G., Quartulli, M., Viola, R., & Zorrilla, M.
Affiliations
Vicomtech (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting
Published
2018-06
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
561-574
ISSN
  • 0018-9316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9611
OpenAlex
W2801164385
Cited by
99
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
Keywords
network resource allocation, quality of experience, 5G, adaptive video streaming, HTTP adaptive streaming, software-defined networking, network function virtualization, autonomous network management, demand forecasting, HEVC, quality of service, machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review