Cited by 47Sparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignAdvanced Data Compression Techniques

Energy-Efficient Multi-Mode Compressed Sensing System for Implantable Neural Recordings

Suo, Yuanming, Zhang, Jie, Xiong, Tao, Chin, Peter S., Etienne-Cummings, Ralph, Tran, Trac D.·2014·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems

Abstract

Widely utilized in the field of Neuroscience, implantable neural recording devices could capture neuron activities with an acquisition rate on the order of megabytes per second. In order to efficiently transmit neural signals through wireless channels, these devices require compression methods that reduce power consumption. Although recent Compressed Sensing (CS) approaches have successfully demonstrated their power, their full potential is yet to be explored. Built upon our previous on-chip CS implementation, we propose an energy efficient multi-mode CS framework that focuses on improving the off-chip components, including (i) a two-stage sensing strategy, (ii) a sparsifying dictionary directly using data, (iii) enhanced compression performance from Full Signal CS mode and Spike Restoration mode to Spike CS + Restoration mode and; (iv) extension of our framework to the Tetrode CS recovery using joint sparsity. This new framework achieves energy efficiency, implementation simplicity and system flexibility simultaneously. Extensive experiments are performed on simulation and real datasets. For our Spike CS + Restoration mode, we achieve a compression ratio of 6% with a reconstruction SNDR > 10 dB and a classification accuracy > 95% for synthetic datasets. For real datasets, we get a 10% compression ratio with ∼ 10 dB for Spike CS + Restoration mode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbcas.2014.2359180

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On-chip signal processing, including spike detection and other data compression, is an emerging trend aimed at reducing transmitted data.

    “Another emerging trend includes on-chip signal processing, such as spike detection [16, 54] or other forms of data compression [108, 132, 155] to reduce the amount of transmitted data.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 47

Authors
Suo, Y., Zhang, J., Xiong, T., Chin, P. S., Etienne-Cummings, R., & Tran, T. D.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
Published
2014-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
0-0
ISSN
  • 1932-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9990
OpenAlex
W2016123757
Cited by
47
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) (1057644, CCF-1117545, DMS-1222567)
  • Army Research Office (60219-MA)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-12-1-0765, N00014-10-1-0223)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
Keywords
compressed sensing, implantable neural recording, energy efficiency, tetrodes, joint sparsity, on-chip signal processing, energy consumption reduction
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Equipment Design, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Neural Prostheses, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review