The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoregressive Estimation of Short Segment Spectra for Computerized EEG Analysis
Abstract
The hypothesis that an electroencephalogram (EEG) can be analyzed by computer using a series of basic descriptive elements of short duration (1-5 s) has prompted the development of methods to extract the best possible features from very short (1 s) time intervals. In this paper, the merits of three alternative methods for estimating spectral features are compared to the fast Fourier transform (FFT). These procedures, based on autoregressive (AR) modeling are: 1) Kalman filtering, 2) the Burg algorithm, and 3) the Yule-Walker (YW) approach. The methods are reportedly able to provide high resolution spectal estimates from short EEG intervals, even in cases where intervals contain less than a ful period of a cyclic waveform. The first method is adaptive, the other two are not. Using Akaike's final prediction error (FPE) criterion, it was demonstrated that a fifth-order filter is sufficient to estimate EEG characteristics in 90 percent of the cases. However, visual inspection of the resulting spectra revealed that the order indicated by the FPE criterion is generally too low and better spectra can be obtained using a tenth-order AR model. The Yule-Walker method resulted in many unstable models and should not be used. Of two remaining methods, i.e., Burg and Kalman, the first provides spectra with peaks having a smaller bandwidth than the Kalman-flter method. Additional experiments with the Burg method revealed that, on the average, the same results were obtained using the FFT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication
Pfurtscheller, G., & Neuper, C. (2001) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.939829 · Cited by 1,990
EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification
Wolpaw, J. R., Ramoser, H., McFarland, D. J., & Pfurtscheller, G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.712231 · Cited by 396
Very high-frequency rhythmic activity during SEEG suppression in frontal lobe epilepsy
Allen, P. J., Fish, D. R., & Smith, S. J. M. (1992) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(92)90160-j · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Jansen, B. H., Bourne, J. R., & Ward, J. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- BME-28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 630-638
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003646190
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.