The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support Vector Channel Selection in BCI
Open accessAbstract
Designing a brain computer interface (BCI) system one can choose from a variety of features that may be useful for classifying brain activity during a mental task. For the special case of classifying electroencephalogram (EEG) signals we propose the usage of the state of the art feature selection algorithms Recursive Feature Elimination and Zero-Norm Optimization which are based on the training of support vector machines (SVM). These algorithms can provide more accurate solutions than standard filter methods for feature selection. We adapt the methods for the purpose of selecting EEG channels. For a motor imagery paradigm we show that the number of used channels can be reduced significantly without increasing the classification error. The resulting best channels agree well with the expected underlying cortical activity patterns during the mental tasks. Furthermore we show how time dependent task specific information can be visualized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: A 10 year update
Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2 · Cited by 2,239
Machine learning in materials science
Wei, J., Chu, X., Sun, X., Xu, K., Deng, H., Chen, J., Wei, Z., & Lei, M. (2019) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12028 · Cited by 1,069
Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R. K., & Birch, G. E. (2007) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/r03 · Cited by 907
Toward enhanced p300 speller performance
Krusienski, D. J., Sellers, E. W., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.017 · Cited by 749
Breaking the silence: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control
Birbaumer, N. (2006) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00456.x · Cited by 722
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lal, T. N., Schroder, M., Hinterberger, T., Weston, J., Bogdan, M., Birbaumer, N., & Scholkopf, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1003-1010
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125675750
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Support Vector Channel Selection in BCI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2004.827827
- The paper
- Lal, T. N., Schroder, M., Hinterberger, T., Weston, J., Bogdan, M., Birbaumer, N., & Scholkopf, B. (2004). Support Vector Channel Selection in BCI. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2004.827827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.