A Compact Large Voltage-Compliance High Output-Impedance Programmable Current Source for Implantable Microstimulators
Abstract
A new CMOS current source is described for biomedical implantable microstimulator applications, which utilizes MOS transistors in deep triode region as linearized voltage controlled resistors (VCR). The VCR current source achieves large voltage compliance, up to 97% of the supply voltage, while maintaining high output impedance in the 100 MOmega range to keep the stimulus current constant within 1% of the desired value irrespective of the site and tissue impedances. This approach improves stimulation efficiency, extends power supply lifetime, and saves chip area especially when the stimulation current level is high in the milliampere range. A prototype 4-channel microstimulator chip is fabricated in the AMI 1.5-microm, 2-metal, 2-poly, n-well standard CMOS process. With a 5-V supply, each stimulating site driver provides at least 425-V compliance and > 10 MOmega output impedance, while sinking up to 210 microA, and occupies 0.05 mm2 in chip area. A modular 32-site wireless neural stimulation microsystem, utilizing the VCR current source, is under development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High compliance voltage for current stimulation consumes large amounts of power and may result in redundant voltage overhead on the electrodes, as their impedance may vary over time and position by several orders of magnitude.
“This consumes large amounts of power and may result in redundant voltage overhead on the electrodes, as their impedance may vary over time and position by several orders of magnitude [78], [128].”
From Active Neural Interface Circuits and Systems for Selective Control of Peripheral Nerves: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [128]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Ghovanloo, M., & Najafi, K.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Ghovanloo, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104985998
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-9-2304)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
- Keywords
- programmable current source, voltage-controlled resistor, high output impedance, voltage compliance, neurostimulation, CMOS integrated circuit, wireless neural stimulation, stimulation efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electronics, Medical, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Miniaturization, Prosthesis Design, Transistors, Electronic, Computer-Aided Design, Electric Impedance, Equipment Failure Analysis, Prostheses and Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review