Cited by 137Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

A Compact Large Voltage-Compliance High Output-Impedance Programmable Current Source for Implantable Microstimulators

Ghovanloo, M., Najafi, K.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

A new CMOS current source is described for biomedical implantable microstimulator applications, which utilizes MOS transistors in deep triode region as linearized voltage controlled resistors (VCR). The VCR current source achieves large voltage compliance, up to 97% of the supply voltage, while maintaining high output impedance in the 100 MOmega range to keep the stimulus current constant within 1% of the desired value irrespective of the site and tissue impedances. This approach improves stimulation efficiency, extends power supply lifetime, and saves chip area especially when the stimulation current level is high in the milliampere range. A prototype 4-channel microstimulator chip is fabricated in the AMI 1.5-microm, 2-metal, 2-poly, n-well standard CMOS process. With a 5-V supply, each stimulating site driver provides at least 425-V compliance and > 10 MOmega output impedance, while sinking up to 210 microA, and occupies 0.05 mm2 in chip area. A modular 32-site wireless neural stimulation microsystem, utilizing the VCR current source, is under development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2004.839797

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High compliance voltage for current stimulation consumes large amounts of power and may result in redundant voltage overhead on the electrodes, as their impedance may vary over time and position by several orders of magnitude.

    “This consumes large amounts of power and may result in redundant voltage overhead on the electrodes, as their impedance may vary over time and position by several orders of magnitude [78], [128].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 137

Authors
Ghovanloo, M., & Najafi, K.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2005-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
97-105
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104985998
Cited by
137
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-9-2304)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
programmable current source, voltage-controlled resistor, high output impedance, voltage compliance, neurostimulation, CMOS integrated circuit, wireless neural stimulation, stimulation efficiency
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electronics, Medical, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Miniaturization, Prosthesis Design, Transistors, Electronic, Computer-Aided Design, Electric Impedance, Equipment Failure Analysis, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review