Band-Tunable and Multiplexed Integrated Circuits for Simultaneous Recording and Stimulation With Microelectrode Arrays
Abstract
Two thin-film microelectrode arrays with integrated circuitry have been developed for extracellular neural recording in behaving animals. An eight-site probe for simultaneous neural recording and stimulation has been designed that includes on-chip amplifiers that can be individually bypassed, allowing direct access to the iridium sites for electrical stimulation. The on-probe amplifiers have a gain of 38.9 dB, an upper-cutoff frequency of 9.9 kHz, and an input-referred noise of 9.2 microV rms integrated from 100 Hz to 10 kHz. The low-frequency cutoff of the amplifier is tunable to allow the recording of field potentials and minimize stimulus artifact. The amplifier consumes 68 microW from +/- 1.5 V supplies and occupies 0.177 mm2 in 3 microm features. In vivo recordings have shown that the preamplifiers can record single-unit activity 1 ms after the onset of stimulation on sites as close as 20 microm to the stimulating electrode. A second neural recording array has been developed which multiplexes 32 neural signals onto four output data leads. Providing gain on this array eliminates the need for bulky headmounted circuitry and reduces motion artifacts. The time-division multiplexing circuitry has crosstalk between consecutive channels of less than 6% at a sample rate of 20 kHz per channel. Amplified, time-division-multiplexed multichannel neural recording allows the large-scale recording of neuronal activity in freely behaving small animals with minimum number of interconnect leads.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies using either a symmetrical cascode OTA or a 2-stage Miller OTA reported NEFs ranging from 4 to 17.
“Indeed, previous studies [53, 98, 128], which used either a symmetrical cascode OTA or a 2-stage Miller OTA, reported NEFs ranging from 4 to 17.”
From Implantable neurotechnologies: a review of integrated circuit neural amplifiers (2016) · cites this paper as [98]
The blanking technique and digital signal processing have been used to cancel the artifact.
“The blanking technique and digital signal processing (Erez et al., 2010) have been used to cancel the artifact (Olsson et al., 2005; Venkatraman et al., 2009; Kent and Grill, 2011; Myers et al., 2011; Zoladz et al., 2012; Wei-Ming et al., 2013; Yi et al., 2013; Bozorgzadeh et al., 2014; Elyahoodayan et al., 2019).”
From Advances in Neural Recording and Stimulation Integrated Circuits (2021) · cites this paper as Olsson et al., 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 181
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [12][12] P. Mohseni and K. Najafi, 'A low-power fully-integrated bandpass operational amplifier for neural recording applications,' in Proc. 2nd Joint EMBS/BMES Conf. , Houston, TX, 2002, pp. 2111-2112. -
- Authors
- OlssonIII, R. H., Buhl, D. L., Sirota, A. M., Buzsaki, G., & Wise, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Sandia National Laboratories (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1303-1311
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138531353
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01ns002329-001)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS02329)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
- Keywords
- microelectrode arrays, neural recording, neurostimulation, on-chip amplifier, time-division multiplexing, multichannel neural recording, field potentials, stimulus artifact, single-unit activity, iridium electrodes, thin-film integrated circuits, freely moving animals
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Amplifiers, Electronic, Animals, Brain, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Microelectrodes, Nerve Net, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Transistors, Electronic, Systems Integration, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review