Cited by 189Inertial Sensor and NavigationContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and Analysis

Estimation and visualization of sagittal kinematics of lower limbs orientation using body-fixed sensors

Open access
Dejnabadi, H., Jolles, B.M., Casanova, E., Fua, P., Aminian, K.·2006·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

A new method of estimating lower limbs orientations using a combination of accelerometers and gyroscopes is presented. The model is based on estimating the accelerations of ankle and knee joints by placing virtual sensors at the centers of rotation. The proposed technique considers human locomotion and biomechanical constraints, and provides a solution to fusing the data of gyroscopes and accelerometers that yields stable and drift-free estimates of segment orientation. The method was validated by measuring lower limb motions of eight subjects, walking at three different speeds, and comparing the results with a reference motion measurement system. The results are very close to those of the reference system presenting very small errors (Shank: rms = 1.0, Thigh: rms = 1.6 degrees) and excellent correlation coefficients (Shank: r = 0.999, Thigh: r = 0.998). Technically, the proposed ambulatory system is portable, easily mountable, and can be used for long-term monitoring without hindrance to natural activities. Finally, a gait analysis tool was designed to visualize the motion data as synthetic skeletons performing the same actions as the subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2006.873678

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 189

Authors
Dejnabadi, H., Jolles, B. M., Casanova, E., Fua, P., & Aminian, K.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2006-07
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
1385-1393
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146592202
Cited by
189
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
21.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
soft sensors, gait analysis, wearable motion sensing
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Graphics, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Female, Gait, Humans, Joints, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Software, Transducers, User-Computer Interface, Range of Motion, Articular, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Lower Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review