The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring of Posture Allocations and Activities by a Shoe-Based Wearable Sensor
Abstract
Monitoring of posture allocations and activities enables accurate estimation of energy expenditure and may aid in obesity prevention and treatment. At present, accurate devices rely on multiple sensors distributed on the body and thus may be too obtrusive for everyday use. This paper presents a novel wearable sensor, which is capable of very accurate recognition of common postures and activities. The patterns of heel acceleration and plantar pressure uniquely characterize postures and typical activities while requiring minimal preprocessing and no feature extraction. The shoe sensor was tested in nine adults performing sitting and standing postures and while walking, running, stair ascent/descent and cycling. Support vector machines (SVMs) were used for classification. A fourfold validation of a six-class subject-independent group model showed 95.2% average accuracy of posture/activity classification on full sensor set and over 98% on optimized sensor set. Using a combination of acceleration/pressure also enabled a pronounced reduction of the sampling frequency (25 to 1 Hz) without significant loss of accuracy (98% versus 93%). Subjects had shoe sizes (US) M9.5-11 and W7-9 and body mass index from 18.1 to 39.4 kg/m2 and thus suggesting that the device can be used by individuals with varying anthropometric characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Obesity and the Environment: Where Do We Go from Here?
Hill, J. O., Wyatt, H. R., Reed, G. W., & Peters, J. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079857 · Cited by 2,180
Self-citationThe Technology of Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitors: Current and Future
CHEN, K. Y., & BASSETT, D. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82 · Cited by 996
Interindividual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity
Levine, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., McCrady, S. K., Krizan, A. C., Olson, L. R., Kane, P. H., Jensen, M. D., & Clark, M. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106561 · Cited by 705
Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application
Corder, K., Brage, S., & Ekelund, U. (2007) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e328285d883 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Wearable Sensors for Human Activity Monitoring: A Review
Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2015) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2014.2370945 · Cited by 1,401
Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement System: A Review
Abdul Razak, A. H., Zayegh, A., Begg, R. K., & Wahab, Y. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120709884 · Cited by 817
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
Chen, K., Zhang, D., Yao, L., Guo, B., Yu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07416 · Cited by 314
“e corrections [80]. When working as wearable devices, pressure sensors can particularly be used for energy harvest and thus realize self-powered applications [71]. They are usually installed in shoes [131] and wrist bands [69] as well as on human’s chests [98]. 2.2 Datasets There is an amount of publicly available hum…”
BackgroundInfluentialSmart Insole: A Wearable Sensor Device for Unobtrusive Gait Monitoring in Daily Life
Lin, F., Wang, A., Zhuang, Y., Tomita, M. R., & Xu, W. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2585643 · Cited by 265
Okai, J., Paraschiakos, S., Beekman, M., Knobbe, A., & de Sa, C. R. (2019) · 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8857288 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Sazonov, E. S., Fulk, G., Hill, J., Schutz, Y., & Browning, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 983-990
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2153657339
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.