The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heartbeat Classification Using Feature Selection Driven by Database Generalization Criteria
Abstract
In this paper, we studied and validated a simple heartbeat classifier based on ECG feature models selected with the focus on an improved generalization capability. We considered features from the RR series, as well as features computed from the ECG samples and different scales of the wavelet transform, at both available leads. The classification performance and generalization were studied using publicly available databases: the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, the MIT-BIH Supraventricular Arrhythmia, and the St. Petersburg Institute of Cardiological Technics (INCART) databases. The Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation recommendations for class labeling and results presentation were followed. A floating feature selection algorithm was used to obtain the best performing and generalizing models in the training and validation sets for different search configurations. The best model found comprehends eight features, was trained in a partition of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, and was evaluated in a completely disjoint partition of the same database. The results obtained were: global accuracy of 93%; for normal beats, sensitivity (S) 95%, positive predictive value (P(+)) 98%; for supraventricular beats, S 77%, P(+) 39%; and for ventricular beats S 81%, P(+) 87%. In order to test the generalization capability, performance was also evaluated in the INCART, with results comparable to those obtained in the test set. This classifier model has fewer features and performs better than other state-of-the-art methods with results suggesting better generalization capability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
Cited by
Heartbeat Classification Using Morphological and Dynamic Features of ECG Signals
Ye, C., Kumar, B. V. K. V., & Coimbra, M. T. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2213253 · Cited by 522
A deep learning approach for ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection
Sannino, G., & De Pietro, G. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.03.057 · Cited by 445
A novel application of deep learning for single-lead ECG classification
Mathews, S. M., Kambhamettu, C., & Barner, K. E. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.013 · Cited by 322
Ansari, Y., Mourad, O., Qaraqe, K., & Serpedin, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1246746 · Cited by 291
Deep learning-based multidimensional feature fusion for classification of ECG arrhythmia
Cui, J., Wang, L., He, X., De Albuquerque, V. H. C., AlQahtani, S. A., & Hassan, M. M. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06487-5 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Llamedo, M., & Martínez, J. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 616-625
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2108396267
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.