The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning for ECG Arrhythmia detection and classification: an overview of progress for period 2017–2023
Open accessAbstract
Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality globally. Electrocardiography (ECG) still represents the benchmark approach for identifying cardiac irregularities. Automatic detection of abnormalities from the ECG can aid in the early detection, diagnosis, and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Deep Learning (DL) architectures have been successfully employed for arrhythmia detection and classification and offered superior performance to traditional shallow Machine Learning (ML) approaches. This survey categorizes and compares the DL architectures used in ECG arrhythmia detection from 2017–2023 that have exhibited superior performance. Different DL models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), Transformers, and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are reviewed, and a summary of their effectiveness is provided. This survey provides a comprehensive roadmap to expedite the acclimation process for emerging researchers willing to develop efficient algorithms for detecting ECG anomalies using DL models. Our tailored guidelines bridge the knowledge gap allowing newcomers to align smoothly with the prevailing research trends in ECG arrhythmia detection. We shed light on potential areas for future research and refinement in model development and optimization, intending to stimulate advancement in ECG arrhythmia detection and classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database
Moody, G. B., & Mark, R. G. (2001) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/51.932724 · Cited by 4,812
Han (2023) · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3152247 · Cited by 4,682
Floating search methods in feature selection
Pudil, P., Novovičová, J., & Kittler, J. (1994) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9 · Cited by 3,098
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440
MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision
Tolstikhin, I., Houlsby, N., Kolesnikov, A., Beyer, L., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Yung, J., Steiner, A., Keysers, D., Uszkoreit, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.01601 · Cited by 2,087
Attia, Z. I., Kapa, S., Lopez-Jimenez, F., McKie, P. M., Ladewig, D. J., Satam, G., Pellikka, P. A., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Noseworthy, P. A., Munger, T. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2 · Cited by 1,389
(2007) · Cited by 937
ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection: A survey
Luz, E. J. D. S., Schwartz, W. R., Cámara-Chávez, G., & Menotti, D. (2016) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.008 · Cited by 878
Yildirim, Ö. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.016 · Cited by 833
Liu, F., Liu, C., Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Wu, X., Xu, X., Liu, Y., Ma, C., Wei, S., He, Z., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics · doi:10.1166/jmihi.2018.2442 · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- Ansari, Y., Mourad, O., Qaraqe, K., & Serpedin, E.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-09-15
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 1246746-1246746
- ISSN
- 1664-042X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386836424
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 97
- FWCI
- 51.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning for ECG Arrhythmia detection and classification: an overview of progress for period 2017–2023. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphys.2023.1246746
- The paper
- Ansari, Y., Mourad, O., Qaraqe, K., & Serpedin, E. (2023). Deep learning for ECG Arrhythmia detection and classification: an overview of progress for period 2017–2023. Frontiers in Physiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1246746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.