Cited by 158Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Human–Robot Synchrony: Flexible Assistance Using Adaptive Oscillators

Open access
Ronsse, Renaud, Vitiello, Nicola, Lenzi, Tommaso, van den Kieboom, Jesse, Carrozza, Maria Chiara, Ijspeert, Auke Jan·2011·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

We propose a novel method for movement assistance that is based on adaptive oscillators, i.e., mathematical tools that are capable of extracting the high-level features (amplitude, frequency, and offset) of a periodic signal. Such an oscillator acts like a filter on these features, but keeps its output in phase with respect to the input signal. Using a simple inverse model, we predicted the torque produced by human participants during rhythmic flexion-extension of the elbow. Feeding back a fraction of this estimated torque to the participant through an elbow exoskeleton, we were able to prove the assistance efficiency through a marked decrease of the biceps and triceps electromyography. Importantly, since the oscillator adapted to the movement imposed by the user, the method flexibly allowed us to change the movement pattern and was still efficient during the nonstationary epochs. This method holds promise for the development of new robot-assisted rehabilitation protocols because it does not require prespecifying a reference trajectory and does not require complex signal sensing or single-user calibration: the only signal that is measured is the position of the augmented joint. In this paper, we further demonstrate that this assistance was very intuitive for the participants who adapted almost instantaneously.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2010.2089629

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent control concept uses adaptive oscillators that synchronize with sinusoidal high-level features of the user's movements, supporting arbitrary rhythmic movements without reference trajectories.

    “In a recent control concept, the haptic controller does not rely on reference trajectories and supports arbitrary rhythmic movements of the user.To do so, the controller uses adaptive oscillators that synchronize with the sinusoidal high-level features of the user's movements (Ronsse, Koopman et al., 2011;Ronsse et al., 2010;Ronsse, Vitiello, et al., 2011).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Ronsse, Vitiello, et al., 2011

  • The control of most haptic guidance feedback strategies is based on reference trajectories, except for zero impedance control and a few model-based algorithms.

    “The control of most haptic guidance feedback strategies is based upon reference trajectories, except for zero impedance control and a few model-based control algorithms (Ronsse, Koopman, et al., 2011;Ronsse et al., 2010;Ronsse, Vitiello, et al., 2011).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Ronsse, Vitiello, et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ronsse, R., Vitiello, N., Lenzi, T., van den Kieboom, J., Carrozza, M. C., & Ijspeert, A. J.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • Biorobotics Lab., Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2011-04
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
1001-1012
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2040344946
Cited by
158
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
adaptive oscillators, mobility assistance, elbow flexion and extension, torque estimation, inverse model, elbow exoskeleton, electromyography, biceps and triceps, rehabilitation robotics
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Arm, Biological Clocks, Computer Simulation, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Models, Biological, Robotics, Therapy, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review