Cited by 11Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Fascicle-Selectivity of an Intraneural Stimulation Electrode in the Rabbit Sciatic Nerve

Nielsen, T. N., Sevcencu, C., Struijk, J. J.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The current literature contains extensive research on peripheral nerve interfaces, including both extraneural and intrafascicular electrodes. Interfascicular electrodes, which are in-between these two with respect to nerve fiber proximity have, however, received little interest. In this proof-of-concept study, an interfascicular electrode was designed to be implanted in the sciatic nerve and activate the tibial and peroneal nerves selectively of each other, and it was tested in acute experiments on nine anaesthetized rabbits. The electrode was inserted without difficulty between the fascicles using blunt glass tools, which could easily penetrate the epineurium but not the perineurium. Selective activation of all tibial and peroneal nerves in the nine animals was achieved with high selectivity (Ŝ = 0.98 ± 0.02). Interfascicular electrodes could provide an interesting addition to the bulk of peripheral nerve interfaces available for neural prosthetic devices. Since interfascicular electrodes can be inserted without fully freeing the nerve and have the advantage of not confining the nerve to a limited space, they could, e.g., be an alternative to extraneural electrodes in locations where such surgery is complicated due to blood vessels or fatty tissue. Further studies are, however, necessary to develop biocompatible electrodes and test their stability and safety in chronic experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2011.2169671

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 11

Authors
Nielsen, T. N., Sevcencu, C., & Struijk, J. J.
Affiliations
Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2012-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
192-197
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W1975528452
Cited by
11
References
33
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
intraneural stimulation, sciatic nerve, tibial nerve, peroneal nerve, peripheral nerve interfaces, neuroprosthetics, neurostimulation, rabbit model
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Differential Threshold, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Nerve Fibers, Rabbits, Sciatic Nerve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Equipment Failure Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review