The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration
Open accessAbstract
Pattern recognition of myoelectric signals for prosthesis control has been extensively studied in research settings and is close to clinical implementation. These systems are capable of intuitively controlling the next generation of dexterous prosthetic hands. However, pattern recognition systems perform poorly in the presence of electrode shift, defined as movement of surface electrodes with respect to the underlying muscles. This paper focused on investigating the optimal interelectrode distance, channel configuration, and electromyography feature sets for myoelectric pattern recognition in the presence of electrode shift. Increasing interelectrode distance from 2 to 4 cm improved pattern recognition system performance in terms of classification error and controllability (p < 0.01). Additionally, for a constant number of channels, an electrode configuration that included electrodes oriented both longitudinally and perpendicularly with respect to muscle fibers improved robustness in the presence of electrode shift (p < 0.05). We investigated the effect of the number of recording channels with and without electrode shift and found that four to six channels were sufficient for pattern recognition control. Finally, we investigated different feature sets for pattern recognition control using a linear discriminant analysis classifier and found that an autoregressive set significantly (p < 0.01) reduced sensitivity to electrode shift compared to a traditional time-domain feature set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control
Englehart, K., & Hudgins, B. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.813539 · Cited by 1,743
Myoelectric control systems—A survey
Asghari Oskoei, M., & Hu, H. (2007) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009 · Cited by 1,244
Control of Multifunctional Prosthetic Hands by Processing the Electromyographic Signal
Zecca, M., Micera, S., Carrozza, M. C., & Dario, P. (2002) · Critical Reviews? in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v30.i456.80 · Cited by 606
Cited by
Classification of Simultaneous Movements Using Surface EMG Pattern Recognition
Young, A. J., Smith, L. H., Rouse, E. J., & Hargrove, L. J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2232293 · Cited by 320
Self-citationProsthetic Myoelectric Control Strategies: A Clinical Perspective
Roche, A. D., Rehbaum, H., Farina, D., & Aszmann, O. C. (2014) · Current Surgery Reports · doi:10.1007/s40137-013-0044-8 · Cited by 261
A survey of sensor fusion methods in wearable robotics
Novak, D., & Riener, R. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.012 · Cited by 252
Ortiz-Catalan, M., Brånemark, R., & Håkansson, B. (2013) · Source Code for Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1186/1751-0473-8-11 · Cited by 232
Samuel, O. W., Asogbon, M. G., Geng, Y., Al-Timemy, A. H., Pirbhulal, S., Ji, N., Chen, S., Fang, P., & Li, G. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2891350 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, A. J., Hargrove, L. J., & Kuiken, T. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 645-652
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2123917016
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2011.2177662
- The paper
- Young, A. J., Hargrove, L. J., & Kuiken, T. A. (2012). Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2011.2177662
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.